Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26854143›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2015

Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer.

Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero, Laura Pelegrí-Martinez, Diego Lopez-Aznar, María Del Puig Cózar-Santiago

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07523516 (Diagnostic Performance of F18-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07523516 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Performance of F18-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2029Enrolled97ConditionsBreast Cancer (Locally Advanced or Metastatic)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Role of PET/CT in Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. NoninvasiveJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Technetium-99m radiolabeled paclitaxel as an imaging probe for breast cancer in vivo.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jose Luis Vercher-ConejeroClinical Area of Medical Imaging, Department of Nuclear Medicine, GIBI230, Polytechnic and University Hospital La Fe, Valencia 46026, Spain. jlvercher@hotmail.com.
Laura Pelegrí-MartinezDiagnostic Imaging, Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi Hospital, Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona 08970, Spain. lpelegri@hotmail.com.
Diego Lopez-AznarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Provincial Hospital Consortium, Castellón de la Plana 12002, Spain. michaeldjjordan@gmail.com.
María Del Puig Cózar-SantiagoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, General University Hospital-ERESA, Valencia 46018, Spain. cozar_mar@gva.es.
Fundación Hospital Provincial de Castellón · ESHospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gradually, FDG-PET/CT has been strengthening within the diagnostic algorithms of oncological diseases. In many of these, PET/CT has shown to be useful at different stages of the disease: diagnosis, staging or re-staging, treatment response assessment, and recurrence. Some of the advantages of this imaging modality versus CT, MRI, bone scan, mammography, or ultrasound, are based on its great diagnostic capacity since, according to the radiopharmaceutical used, it reflects metabolic changes that often occur before morphological changes and therefore allows us to stage at diagnosis. Moreover, another advantage of this technique is that it allows us to evaluate the whole body so it can be very useful for the detection of distant disease. With regard to breast cancer, FDG-PET/CT has proven to be important when recurrence is suspected or in the evaluation of treatment response. The technological advancement of PET equipment through the development of new detectors and equipment designed specifically for breast imaging, and the development of more specific radiopharmaceuticals for the study of the different biological processes of breast cancer, will allow progress not only in making the diagnosis of the disease at an early stage but also in enabling personalized therapy for patients with breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancerdedicated breast PETFDG-PETnon-FDG radiopharmaceuticalsPET/CTPET/MRI

Identifiers

PMID26854143
PMCPMC4665546
OpenAlexW2034181352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.