Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26854015›Full record

SynthesisHuman brain mapping2016

Computational meta-analysis of statistical parametric maps in major depression.

Danilo Arnone, Dominic Job, Sudhakar Selvaraj, Osamu Abe, Francesco Amico, Yuqi Cheng, Sean J Colloby, John T O'Brien, Thomas Frodl, Ian H Gotlib and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05034523 (Voxel Based Morphometry In Patients With Psychotic Versus Non Psychotic Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05034523 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Voxel Based Morphometry In Patients With Psychotic Versus Non Psychotic Depression

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled66ConditionsPsychotic Depression, Non Psychotic DepressionArmsMRI Voxel based morphometry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Meta-analysis of cortical thickness abnormalities in medication-free patients with major depressive disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Hippocampal volume and depression among young children.Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · 2019
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. AiScience · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Danilo ArnoneCentre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dominic JobNeuroimaging Sciences, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sudhakar SelvarajDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Osamu AbeDepartment of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Francesco AmicoTrinity College School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Neuroimaging Group, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Yuqi ChengDepartment of Psychiatry, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Sean J CollobyInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
John T O'BrienInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Thomas FrodlTrinity College School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Neuroimaging Group, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Ian H GotlibDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Byung-Joo HamDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
M Justin KimDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
P Cédric M P KoolschijnDutch Autism & ADHD Research Center Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cintia A-M PéricoDisciplinas De Psiquiatria E Psicologia Médica Da Faculdade De Medicina Do ABC Coordenadora Da Enfermaria De Psiquiatria Do Hospital Estadual Mário Covas, San Paolo, Brazil.
Giacomo SalvadoreNeuroscience Experimental Medicine, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, New Jersey.
Alan J ThomasInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Marie-José Van TolNeuroimaging Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Nic J A van der WeeLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition/Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Leiden University and Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Dick J VeltmanDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gerd WagnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Andrew M McIntoshDivision of Psychiatry, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400074Medical Research Council G0502157Medical Research Council G0900652Medical Research Council G1100540Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104036/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSeveral neuroimaging meta-analyses have summarized structural brain changes in major depression using coordinate-based methods. These methods might be biased toward brain regions where significant differences were found in the original studies. In this study, a novel voxel-based technique is implemented that estimates and meta-analyses between-group differences in grey matter from individual MRI studies, which are then applied to the study of major depression.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies were conducted comparing participants with major depression and healthy controls by using statistical parametric maps. Summary effect sizes were computed correcting for multiple comparisons at the voxel level. Publication bias and heterogeneity were also estimated and the excess of heterogeneity was investigated with metaregression analyses.

resultsPatients with major depression were characterized by diffuse bilateral grey matter loss in ventrolateral and ventromedial frontal systems extending into temporal gyri compared to healthy controls. Grey matter reduction was also detected in the right parahippocampal and fusiform gyri, hippocampus, and bilateral thalamus. Other areas included parietal lobes and cerebellum. There was no evidence of statistically significant publication bias or heterogeneity.

conclusionsThe novel computational meta-analytic approach used in this study identified extensive grey matter loss in key brain regions implicated in emotion generation and regulation. Results are not biased toward the findings of the original studies because they include all available imaging data, irrespective of statistically significant regions, resulting in enhanced detection of additional areas of grey matter loss.

Indexed as

Brain MappingGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderNerve Netaffective disordersdepressionmagnetic resonance imagingmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID26854015
PMCPMC6867585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.