ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2016
Making muscle: Morphogenetic movements and molecular mechanisms of myogenesis in Xenopus laevis.
Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Putative muscle stem cells promoteProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Trunk muscle differentiation-a lesson from the Chinese fire-bellied newt (Hypselotriton orientalis).Protoplasma · 2025Article
- Exploring the expression of MMP-2, MT1-MMP, and MMP-9 in the pectoral muscle of Ross chickens during E11, E15, and E19 of fetal development.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2025Article
- Constructing the pharyngula: Connecting the primary axial tissues of the head with the posterior axial tissues of the tail.Cells & development · 2023Review
- Article
- Cell-based allometry: an approach for evaluation of complexity in morphogenesis.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2023Article
- Evolution of Somite Compartmentalization: A View FromFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Somite Compartments in Amphioxus and Its Implications on the Evolution of the Vertebrate Skeletal Tissues.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Comparative Embryonic Spatio-Temporal Expression Profile Map of theFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Article
- miR-221 modulates skeletal muscle satellite cells proliferation and differentiation.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2018Article
- The brain is required for normal muscle and nerve patterning during early Xenopus development.Nature communications · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Xenopus laevis offers unprecedented access to the intricacies of muscle development. The large, robust embryos make it ideal for manipulations at both the tissue and molecular level. In particular, this model system can be used to fate map early muscle progenitors, visualize cell behaviors associated with somitogenesis, and examine the role of signaling pathways that underlie induction, specification, and differentiation of muscle. Several characteristics that are unique to X. laevis include myogenic waves with distinct gene expression profiles and the late formation of dermomyotome and sclerotome. Furthermore, myogenesis in the metamorphosing frog is biphasic, facilitating regeneration studies. In this review, we describe the morphogenetic movements that shape the somites and discuss signaling and transcriptional regulation during muscle development and regeneration. With recent advances in gene editing tools, X. laevis remains a premier model organism for dissecting the complex mechanisms underlying the specification, cell behaviors, and formation of the musculature system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.