Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26853882›Full record

ArticleChemical communications (Cambridge, England)2016

Comparison of design strategies for α-helix backbone modification in a protein tertiary fold.

Nathan A Tavenor, Zachary E Reinert, George A Lengyel, Brian D Griffith, W Seth Horne

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interplay between CChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Backbone Modification in a Protein Hydrophobic Core.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vagabond: bond-based parametrization reduces overfitting for refinement of proteins.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Receptor selectivity from minimal backbone modification of a polypeptide agonist.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Differential Effects of βAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathan A TavenorDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. horne@pitt.edu.
Zachary E ReinertDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. horne@pitt.edu.
George A LengyelDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. horne@pitt.edu.
Brian D GriffithDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. horne@pitt.edu.
W Seth HorneDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. horne@pitt.edu.

Funding

Molecular Mimics of Protein Tertiary Folding from Primary Sequence InformationR01GM107161 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HORNE, WILLIAM SETH · 2013 to 2022
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM107161NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report here the comparison of five classes of unnatural amino acid building blocks for their ability to be accommodated into an α-helix in a protein tertiary fold context. High-resolution structural characterization and analysis of folding thermodynamics yield new insights into the relationship between backbone composition and folding energetics in α-helix mimetics and suggest refined design rules for engineering the backbones of natural sequences.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceMolecular Sequence DataProtein FoldingProteinsProtein Structure, TertiarySequence Homology, Amino AcidThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26853882
PMCPMC4767680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.