Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26853137›Full record

Trial reportJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2016

Continuing versus Stopping Prestroke Antihypertensive Therapy in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Subgroup Analysis of the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke Trial.

Kailash Krishnan, Polly Scutt, Lisa Woodhouse, Alessandro Adami, Jennifer L Becker, Lesley A Cala, Ana M Casado, Christopher Chen, Robert A Dineen, John Gommans and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 15 institutions in 12 countries.

Kailash KrishnanStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Polly ScuttStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Lisa WoodhouseStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Alessandro AdamiStroke Centre, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Via Sempreboni, Verona, Italy.
Jennifer L BeckerDepartment of Medical Imaging, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Lesley A CalaSchool of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.
Ana M CasadoDivision of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Christopher ChenDepartment of Pharmacology, National University Hospital of Singapore, Singapore.
Robert A DineenRadiological Sciences Research Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
John GommansDepartment of Medicine, Hawke's Bay Hospital, Hastings, New Zealand.
Panos KoumellisDepartment of Neuroradiology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Hanna ChristensenDepartment of Neurology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ronan CollinsStroke Service, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Anna CzlonkowskaDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Kennedy R LeesInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
George NtaiosDepartment of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Serefnur OzturkDepartment of Neurology, Selcuk University Medical Faculty, Konya, Turkey.
Stephen J PhillipsDivision of Neurology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, and Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Nikola SpriggStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Szabolcs SzatmariDepartment of Neurology, Clinical County Emergency Hospital, Targu Mures, Romania.
Joanna M WardlawDivision of Neuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Philip M BathStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: philip.bath@nottingham.ac.uk.
ENOS Investigators
University of Nottingham · GBWestern General Hospital · GBBispebjerg Hospital · DKDalhousie University · CAHawke's Bay Hospital · NZInstitute of Psychiatry and Neurology · PLNational University Hospital · SGOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITQueen's Medical Centre · GBSelçuk University · TRTallaght University Hospital · IEThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMore than 50% of patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are taking antihypertensive drugs before ictus. Although antihypertensive therapy should be given long term for secondary prevention, whether to continue or stop such treatment during the acute phase of ICH remains unclear, a question that was addressed in the Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke (ENOS) trial.

methodsENOS was an international multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded endpoint trial. Among 629 patients with ICH and systolic blood pressure between 140 and 220 mmHg, 246 patients who were taking antihypertensive drugs were assigned to continue (n = 119) or to stop (n = 127) taking drugs temporarily for 7 days. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included death, length of stay in hospital, discharge destination, activities of daily living, mood, cognition, and quality of life.

resultsBlood pressure level (baseline 171/92 mmHg) fell in both groups but was significantly lower at 7 days in those patients assigned to continue antihypertensive drugs (difference 9.4/3.5 mmHg, P < .01). At 90 days, the primary outcome did not differ between the groups; the adjusted common odds ratio (OR) for worse outcome with continue versus stop drugs was .92 (95% confidence interval, .45-1.89; P = .83). There was no difference between the treatment groups for any secondary outcome measure, or rates of death or serious adverse events.

conclusionsAmong patients with acute ICH, immediate continuation of antihypertensive drugs during the first week did not reduce death or major disability in comparison to stopping treatment temporarily.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDisability EvaluationDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansHypertensionIntracranial Hemorrhage, HypertensiveLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNitric Oxide DonorsAntihypertensive AgentsNitric Oxide DonorsNitroglycerinAntihypertensive therapyblood pressurecerebrovascular disordersglyceryl trinitrateintracerebral hemorrhagerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID26853137
PMCPMC4851456
OpenAlexW2265181927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.