ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2016
Assessing the impact of long term frozen storage of faecal samples on protein concentration and protease activity.
Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of Storage Conditions and Quality Control Markers for Metabolites and Lipids in Human Feces.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Article
- The microbiologist's guide to metaproteomics.iMeta · 2025Review
- A Proteogenomic Approach to Unveiling the Complex Biology of the Microbiome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- New Faecal Calprotectin Assay by IDS: Validation and Comparison to DiaSorin Method.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effects of bowel preparation on intestinal bacterial associated urine and faecal metabolites and the associated faecal microbiome.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Inferring early-life host and microbiome functions by mass spectrometry-based metaproteomics and metabolomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- The Multiomics Analyses of Fecal Matrix and Its Significance to Coeliac Disease Gut Profiling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Ursodeoxycholic acid enriches intestinal bile salt hydrolase-expressing Bacteroidetes in cholestatic pregnancy.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Storage procedures and time influence the detectability ofJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2020Article
- Metaproteomics of the human gut microbiota: Challenges and contributions to other OMICS.Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.) · 2019Review
- Effects of the long-term storage of human fecal microbiota samples collected in RNAlater.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Functional microbiomics: Evaluation of gut microbiota-bile acid metabolism interactions in health and disease.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2018Article
- Metaproteomic analysis of human gut microbiota: where are we heading?Journal of biomedical science · 2017Review
- Association of enteric parasitic infections with intestinal inflammation and permeability in asymptomatic infants of São Tomé Island.Pathogens and global health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe proteome is the second axis of the microbiome:host interactome and proteases are a significant aspect in this interaction. They interact with a large variety of host proteins and structures and in many situations are implicated in pathogenesis. Furthermore faecal samples are commonly collected and stored frozen so they can be analysed at a later date. So we were interested to know whether long term storage affected the integrity of proteases and total protein and whether historical native faecal samples were still a viable option for answering research questions around the functional proteome.
methodsFaecal samples were collected from 3 healthy volunteers (3 biological replicates) and processed in order to be stored at both -20 °C and -80 °C and in a variety of storage buffers. Protein extraction, protein content and protease activity were assessed at the time of collection, after 24h, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months 6 months and finally 1 year.
resultsBeadbeating impacted the quantity of protein extracted, while sodium azide did not impact protease assays. Long term storage of extracted proteins showed that both total protein and protease activity were affected when they were stored as extracted protein. Intact faecal samples were shown to maintain both protein levels and protease activity regardless of time and temperature.
conclusionsBeadbeating increases the protein and protease activity when extracting from a faecal sample, however, the extracted protein is not stable and activity is lost, even with a suitable storage buffer. The most robust solution is to store the proteins in an intact frozen native faecal matrix and extract at the time of assay or analysis, this approach was shown to be suitable for samples in which, there are low levels of protease activity and which had been frozen for a year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.