Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26853071›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2016

Quality of chronic kidney disease management in primary care: a retrospective study.

Vincent A Van Gelder, Nynke D Scherpbier-De Haan, Wim J C De Grauw, Gerald M M Vervoort, Chris Van Weel, Marion C J Biermans, Jozé C C Braspenning, Jack F M Wetzels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Care Processes and Clinical Responses to Newly Detected Albuminuria: The Stockholm Creatinine Measurements (SCREAM) Project.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2026
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vincent A Van Geldera Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands ;
Nynke D Scherpbier-De Haana Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands ;
Wim J C De Grauwa Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands ;
Gerald M M Vervoortb Department of Nephrology , Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands ;
Chris Van Weela Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands ;
Marion C J Biermansa Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands ;
Jozé C C Braspenningc IQ Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands ;
Jack F M Wetzelsb Department of Nephrology , Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands ;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection and appropriate management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality.

aimTo assess the quality of care (QoC) of CKD in primary healthcare in relation to patient and practice characteristics in order to tailor improvement strategies. DESIGN AND

settingRetrospective study using data between 2008 and 2011 from 47 general practices (207 469 patients of whom 162 562 were adults).

methodCKD management of patients under the care of their general practitioner (GP) was qualified using indicators derived from the Dutch interdisciplinary CKD guideline for primary care and nephrology and included (1) monitoring of renal function, albuminuria, blood pressure, and glucose, (2) monitoring of metabolic parameters, and alongside the guideline: (3) recognition of CKD. The outcome indicator was (4) achieving blood pressure targets. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was applied to identify associated patient and practice characteristics.

resultsKidney function or albuminuria data were available for 59 728 adult patients; 9288 patients had CKD, of whom 8794 were under GP care. Monitoring of disease progression was complete in 42% of CKD patients, monitoring of metabolic parameters in 2%, and blood pressure target was reached in 43.1%. GPs documented CKD in 31.4% of CKD patients. High QoC was strongly associated with diabetes, and to a lesser extent with hypertension and male sex.

conclusionRoom for improvement was found in all aspects of CKD management. As QoC was higher in patients who received structured diabetes care, future CKD care may profit from more structured primary care management, e.g. according to the chronic care model. KEY POINTS: Quality of care for chronic kidney disease patients in primary care can be improved. In comparison with guideline advice, adequate monitoring of disease progression was observed in 42%, of metabolic parameters in 2%, correct recognition of impaired renal function in 31%, and reaching blood pressure targets in 43% of chronic kidney disease patients. Quality of care was higher in patients with diabetes. Chronic kidney disease management may be improved by developing strategies similar to diabetes care.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective StudiesChronic kidney diseaseelectronic medical recordsgeneral practiceprimary health carequality of health carethe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID26853071
PMCPMC4911031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.