Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26852796›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Performance characteristics of visualising the cervix in symptomatic young females: a review of primary care records in females with and without cervical cancer.

Anita Wey Wey Lim, Willie Hamilton, Antony Hollingworth, Sally Stapley, Peter Sasieni

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cytology in the diagnosis of cervical cancer in symptomatic young women: a retrospective review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anita Wey Wey LimCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London.
Willie HamiltonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
Antony HollingworthWhipps Cross University Hospital, London.
Sally StapleyUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
Peter SasieniCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London.
University of Exeter · GBWhipps Cross University Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16892Cancer Research UK C8162/A16892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current strategy for timely detection of cervical cancer in young females centres on visualising the cervix when females present with gynaecological symptoms, but is based on expert opinion without an evidence base.

aimTo assess visualising the cervix in primary care in young females with gynaecological symptoms. DESIGN AND

settingA review of primary care records for females in England aged 20-29 years with cervical cancer (nationwide interview-based study) and in the general population (Clinical Practice Research Datalink database).

methodFrom primary care records the proportion of females was identified with gynaecological symptoms who had documented cervical examination in the year before diagnosis (cancers) and in 1-year age bands (general population). Of these, the proportion was identified that was then referred for suspected malignancy.

resultsOnly 39% of young females with cervical cancer had documented examination at symptomatic presentation. Visualisation resulted in referral for suspected malignancy for 18% of those examined (95% confidence interval = 5% to 40%). Very few (<1.7%) symptomatic females in the general population had documented cervical examination. None were referred for suspected malignancy at the time.

conclusionThe sensitivity of cervical examination to detect cancer is very low, highlighting the need for better triage tools for primary care. Until such tools are identified GPs should continue to consider cervical cancer when symptoms persist and the cervix is not obviously abnormal on clinical examination. Further research on additional triage tools such as cervical cytology used as a diagnostic aid is needed urgently.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAbdominal PainCervix UteriDyspareuniaEarly Detection of CancerEnglandEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMedical RecordsPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Dischargecervical cancerearly diagnosisfemalegynaecological examinationprimary caresymptom assessmentyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID26852796
PMCPMC4758498
OpenAlexW2259128119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.