ArticleNeuroscience2016
Transplantation of neural progenitor cells in chronic spinal cord injury.
Article in Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phycocyanin enhances potential neural stem cell differentiation in iron doped chitosan hydroxyapatite scaffolds.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Insights into Astrogliosis, Inflammation Processes, and Emerging Treatments by Exosome Therapy and Low-Level Laser Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Review
- Differences in Anatomical Outcomes Between Early Chronic and Far Chronic Time-Points After Transplantation of Spinal Cord Neural Progenitor Cells in Mice.Journal of neurotrauma · 2023Article
- Stem Cell Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2023Review
- Developmental stage of transplanted neural progenitor cells influences anatomical and functional outcomes after spinal cord injury in mice.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Advances in Neural Stem Cell Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury: Safety, Efficacy, and Future Perspectives.Neurospine · 2022Article
- A Narrative Review of Advances in Neural Precursor Cell Transplantation Therapies for Spinal Cord Injury.Neurospine · 2022Article
- Effects of biological sex mismatch on neural progenitor cell transplantation for spinal cord injury in mice.Nature communications · 2022Article
- NPC transplantation rescues sci-driven cAMP/EPAC2 alterations, leading to neuroprotection and microglial modulation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Article
- Article
- Cell transplantation to repair the injured spinal cord.International review of neurobiology · 2022Article
- Considerations for the clinical use of stem cells in genitourinary regenerative medicine.World journal of stem cells · 2021Review
- Induced pluripotent stem cell technology for spinal cord injury: a promising alternative therapy.Neural regeneration research · 2021Article
- Collagen/heparan sulfate porous scaffolds loaded with neural stem cells improve neurological function in a rat model of traumatic brain injury.Neural regeneration research · 2021Article
- Current Concepts of Neural Stem/Progenitor Cell Therapy for Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021Review
- Stem Cell Therapy for Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction in Rodent Models: A Systematic Review.International neurourology journal · 2020Article
- Transplantation of Skin Precursor-Derived Schwann Cells Yields Better Locomotor Outcomes and Reduces Bladder Pathology in Rats with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Stem cell reports · 2020Article
- Stem Cell Therapy for Neurogenic Bladder After Spinal Cord Injury: Clinically Possible?International neurourology journal · 2020Article
- Effects of neural stem cell transplantation on the motor function of rats with contusion spinal cord injuries: a meta-analysis.Neural regeneration research · 2020Article
- Neural stem cell delivery via porous collagen scaffolds promotes neuronal differentiation and locomotion recovery in spinal cord injury.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated that neural progenitor cells (NPCs) transplanted into a subacute contusion injury improve motor, sensory, and bladder function. In this study we tested whether transplanted NPCs can also improve functional recovery after chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) alone or in combination with the reduction of glial scar and neurotrophic support. Adult rats received a T10 moderate contusion. Thirteen weeks after the injury they were divided into four groups and received either: 1. Medium (control), 2. NPC transplants, 3. NPC+lentivirus vector expressing chondroitinase, or 4. NPC+lentivirus vectors expressing chondroitinase and neurotrophic factors. During the 8 weeks post-transplantation the animals were tested for functional recovery and eventually analyzed by anatomical and immunohistochemical assays. The behavioral tests for motor and sensory function were performed before and after injury, and weekly after transplantation, with some animals also tested for bladder function at the end of the experiment. Transplant survival in the chronic injury model was variable and showed NPCs at the injury site in 60% of the animals in all transplantation groups. The NPC transplants comprised less than 40% of the injury site, without significant anatomical or histological differences among the groups. All groups also showed similar patterns of functional deficits and recovery in the 12 weeks after injury and in the 8 weeks after transplantation using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan rating score, the grid test, and the Von Frey test for mechanical allodynia. A notable exception was group 4 (NPC together with chondroitinase and neurotrophins), which showed a significant improvement in bladder function. This study underscores the therapeutic challenges facing transplantation strategies in a chronic SCI in which even the inclusion of treatments designed to reduce scarring and increase neurotrophic support produce only modest functional improvements. Further studies will have to identify the combination of acute and chronic interventions that will augment the survival and efficacy of neural cell transplants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.