Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26852218›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2016

Optimising MR perfusion imaging: comparison of different software-based approaches in acute ischaemic stroke.

Lars-Arne Schaafs, David Porter, Heinrich J Audebert, Jochen B Fiebach, Kersten Villringer

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lars-Arne SchaafsDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany. lars-arne.schaafs@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2250-5419
David PorterFraunhofer Institute for Medical Image Computing MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Heinrich J AudebertDepartment of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Jochen B FiebachAcademic Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology and Center for Stroke Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Kersten VillringerAcademic Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology and Center for Stroke Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPerfusion imaging (PI) is susceptible to confounding factors such as motion artefacts as well as delay and dispersion (D/D). We evaluate the influence of different post-processing algorithms on hypoperfusion assessment in PI analysis software packages to improve the clinical accuracy of stroke PI.

methodsFifty patients with acute ischaemic stroke underwent MRI imaging in the first 24 h after onset. Diverging approaches to motion and D/D correction were applied. The calculated MTT and CBF perfusion maps were assessed by volumetry of lesions and tested for agreement with a standard approach and with the final lesion volume (FLV) on day 6 in patients with persisting vessel occlusion.

resultsMTT map lesion volumes were significantly smaller throughout the software packages with correction of motion and D/D when compared to the commonly used approach with no correction (p = 0.001-0.022). Volumes on CBF maps did not differ significantly (p = 0.207-0.925). All packages with advanced post-processing algorithms showed a high level of agreement with FLV (ICC = 0.704-0.879).

conclusionsCorrection of D/D had a significant influence on estimated lesion volumes and leads to significantly smaller lesion volumes on MTT maps. This may improve patient selection. KEY POINTS: • Assessment on hypoperfusion using advanced post-processing with correction for motion and D/D. • CBF appears to be more robust regarding differences in post-processing. • Tissue at risk is estimated more accurately by correcting software algorithms. • Advanced post-processing algorithms show a higher agreement with the final lesion volume.

Indexed as

SoftwareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedPerfusion ImagingStrokeImage processingMRIPerfusionSoftwareStroke

Identifiers

PMID26852218
OpenAlexW2287244805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.