Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26852118›Full record

SynthesisMalaria journal2016

What is the value of reactive case detection in malaria control? A case-study in India and a systematic review.

Anna Maria van Eijk, Lalitha Ramanathapuram, Patrick L Sutton, Deena Kanagaraj, G Sri Lakshmi Priya, Sangamithra Ravishankaran, Aswin Asokan, Nikunj Tandel, Ankita Patel, Nisha Desai and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03511443 (Evaluation of the Performance of a Highly-sensitive Rapid Diagnostic Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03511443 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Performance of a Highly-sensitive Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Versus Conventional RDT, Compared With PCR as the Gold Standard, in Reactive Case Detection of Malaria Infections in Rakhine State, Myanmar

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Research Co, LLCRan2017 to 2018Enrolled1,980ConditionsMalaria Diagnosis, Malaria,FalciparumArmshsRDT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk Factor Analysis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka through a Nationwide Survey.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Maria van EijkCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA. amvaneijk@gmail.com.
Lalitha RamanathapuramCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA. lalitharv@nyu.edu.
Patrick L SuttonCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA. psutton@acselhealth.com.
Deena KanagarajNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. dr.deena.k@gmail.com.
G Sri Lakshmi PriyaNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. priya.biotech90@gmail.com.
Sangamithra RavishankaranNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. vr.sangamithra@gmail.com.
Aswin AsokanNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. ashwinviro@gmail.com.
Nikunj TandelNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India. nikunjtandel.2jbs@gmail.com.
Ankita PatelNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India. patelankij@gmail.com.
Nisha DesaiNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India. desainisha25@gmail.com.
Ranvir SinghNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India. drranvir.singh@yahoo.co.in.
Steven A SullivanCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA. sullis02@nyu.edu.
Jane M CarltonCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA. carltj01@nyu.edu.
H C SrivastavaNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India. hcsrv5@gmail.com.
Alex EapenNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. alexeapen@yahoo.com.
National Institute of Malaria Research · INNew York University · USIndian Council of Medical Research · INNational Institute of Epidemiology · IN

Funding

Using Next-Generation Genomics to Study Antimalarial Drug Resistance in IndiaU19AI089676 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARLTON, JANE M · 2010 to 2023
$22.6M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089676NIAID NIH HHS U19AI089676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReactive case detection (RCD) for malaria is a strategy to identify additional malaria infections in areas of low malaria transmission and can complement passive surveillance. This study describes experiences with RCD in two Indian sites, and aimed to synthesize experiences with RCD across endemic countries.

methodsRCD programmes were piloted in two urban areas of India with a low prevalence of mainly Plasmodium vivax malaria in 2014. Cases were identified in a clinic by microscopy and contacts were screened within 2 weeks; PCR, in addition to microscopy, was used to detect Plasmodium parasites. A systematic review was conducted to identify RCD experiences in the literature.

resultsIn Chennai, 868 contacts were enrolled for 18 index cases of clinical malaria; in Nadiad, 131 contacts were enrolled for 20 index cases. No new malaria infections were detected in Nadiad among contacts, and four new infections were detected in Chennai (three P. vivax and one Plasmodium falciparum), of which two were among household members of index cases. An additional five studies describing results from an RCD strategy were identified in the literature: four in Africa and one in Thailand. Including the results from India, the average number of contacts screened per index case in a total of seven studies ranged from four to 50, and 126 in a case study in Thailand with one index case. Malaria was detected in 0-45 % of the contacted persons. The average number of index cases needed to be traced to find one new case of malaria ranged from one to five, and could not be assessed in one study in India (no contacts positive for 20 cases). Sharing the household with an index case was associated with a five-fold increased risk of malaria compared to contacts from households without an index case (pooled risk ratio 5.29, 95 % CI 3.31-8.47, I(2) 0 %, four studies).

conclusionsRCD in areas of low malaria transmission is a labour-intensive strategy, and its benefit is not clear. Studies are needed to assess how RCD can be optimized or into alternatives where interventions are targeted to family members or hotspots.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolHumansIndiaInfantMalariaMalaria, VivaxMiddle AgedPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium vivaxYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26852118
PMCPMC4744450
OpenAlexW2259457252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.