ReviewSeminars in fetal & neonatal medicine2016
The genomics of prematurity in an era of more precise clinical phenotyping: A review.
Review in Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- DNA methylation studies of depression with onset in the peripartum: A critical systematic review.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Discovering latent subtypes of preterm birth and genetic risk using tensor decomposition on electronic health records.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Genomic Differences between Spontaneous versus Indicated Extreme Preterm Birth.American journal of perinatology · 2025Article
- Unravelling the genetic landscape of cervical insufficiency: Insights into connective tissue dysfunction and hormonal pathways.PloS one · 2024Article
- "The First Thousand Days" Define a Fetal/Neonatal Neurology Program.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- Article
- Preterm Birth: A Narrative Review of the Current Evidence on Nutritional and Bioactive Solutions for Risk Reduction.Nutrients · 2019Review
- Prospective longitudinal study of the pregnancy DNA methylome: the US Pregnancy, Race, Environment, Genes (PREG) study.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Functional variation of SHP-2 promoter is associated with preterm birth and delayed myelination and motor development in preterm infants.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Spontaneous preterm birth is a major public health problem, with a clear genetic component. Genetic association studies have evolved substantially in recent years, moving away from the traditional candidate gene analyses to newer approaches utilizing sophisticated analysis platforms to examine sequencing data, and shifting towards functional studies including methylation analysis. It is becoming increasingly evident that careful clinical phenotyping is crucial to high quality genetic association studies regardless of the assay or platform being used. Nonetheless, genetic studies of prematurity are hampered by numerous challenges including small sample sizes, incomplete phenotying, population stratification, and multiple comparisons. As the costs of sequencing and functional analyses continue to decrease, unbiased genome-wide assays will be more widely available. Researchers have met improved success recently when critically applying clinical phenotyping knowledge to group women prior to analyzing genotyping results. Eventually, as the analytic approaches evolve, it is likely that this methodology (combining precisely clinically phenotyped subjects with genome-wide data) will provide key information regarding the pathophysiology of prematurity, and provide potential new avenues for exploring innovative therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.