Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26851651›Full record

ArticleForensic science international2016

Oral fluid cocaine and benzoylecgonine concentrations following controlled intravenous cocaine administration.

Kayla N Ellefsen, Marta Concheiro, Sandrine Pirard, David A Gorelick, Marilyn A Huestis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Positivity to Cocaine and/or Benzoylecgonine in Confirmation Analyses for On-Road Tests in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kayla N EllefsenChemistry and Drug Metabolism Section, IRP, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD; Program in Toxicology, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD.
Marta ConcheiroCurrently at Department of Sciences, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, New York, NY.
Sandrine PirardChemistry and Drug Metabolism Section, IRP, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD.
David A GorelickDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Marilyn A HuestisChemistry and Drug Metabolism Section, IRP, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: mhuestis@intra.nida.nih.gov.
National Institute on Drug Abuse · USJohn Jay College of Criminal Justice · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Detection Of Drugs Of Abuse In Alternative Biological Fluids And TissuesZIADA000412 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SCHEIDWEILER, KARL · 2009 to 2016
$3.9M
Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics Of Drugs Of AbuseZIADA000414 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SCHEIDWEILER, KARL · 2009 to 2016
$2.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000412Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited oral fluid (OF) pharmacokinetic data collected with commercially available collection devices after controlled cocaine administration hinder OF result interpretations. Ten cocaine-using adults provided OF, collected with Oral-Eze(®) (OE) and StatSure Saliva Sampler™ (SS) devices, an hour prior to and up to 69 h after 25mg intravenous (IV) cocaine administration. Cocaine and benzoylecgonine (BE) were quantified by a validated 2D-GC-MS method. Large inter-subject variability was observed. Cocaine was detected in OF in the first 0.17 h sample after IV administration, with much more rapid elimination than BE. OE observed Cmax median (range) concentrations were 932 (394-1574)μg/L for cocaine and 248 (96.9-953)μg/L for BE. SS observed cocaine and BE Cmax median (range) concentrations trended lower at 732 (83.3-1892)μg/L and 360 (77.2-836)μg/L, respectively. OE and SS cocaine OF detection times were 12.5 and 6.5h and for BE 30.5 and 28.0 h, respectively at 1 μg/L. There were no significant pharmacokinetic differences between OE and SS OF collection devices, except cocaine half-life was significantly shorter in SS OF specimens. This difference could be attributed to differences in stabilizing buffers present in OF collection devices, which may affect cocaine stability in OF specimens, or decreased recovery from collection pads. Both OE and SS OF collection devices were effective in monitoring cocaine and metabolite concentrations with similar detection windows. Furthermore, we demonstrated that different confirmatory OF cutoffs can be selected to produce shorter or longer cocaine and metabolite detection windows to address specific needs of clinical and forensic drug testing programs.

Indexed as

AdultCocaineFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHalf-LifeHumansInjections, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedNarcoticsSalivaSubstance Abuse DetectionTime FactorsbenzoylecgonineCocaineNarcoticsBenzoylecgonineCocaineOral-Eze(®)Oral FluidPharmacokineticsStatSure Saliva Sampler™

Identifiers

PMID26851651
PMCPMC4761476
OpenAlexW2259789286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.