Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26850504›Full record

ReviewPostgraduate medical journal2016

Continuing medical education for general practitioners: a practice format.

Lena VanNieuwenborg, Martine Goossens, Jan De Lepeleire, Birgitte Schoenmakers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postgraduate medical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lena VanNieuwenborgDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Martine GoossensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan De LepeleireDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Birgitte SchoenmakersDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOur current knowledge-based society and the many actualisations within the medical profession require a great responsibility of physicians to continuously develop and refine their skills. In this article, we reflect on some recent findings in the field of continuing education for professional doctors (continuing medical education, CME). Second, we describe the development of a CME from the Academic Center for General Practice (ACHG) of the KU Leuven.

methodsFirst, we performed a literature study and we used unpublished data of a need assessment performed (2013) in a selected group of general practitioners. Second, we describe the development of a proposal to establish a CME programme for general practitioners.

resultsCME should go beyond the sheer acquisition of knowledge, and also seek changes in practice, attitudes and behaviours of physicians. The continuing education offerings are subject to the goals of the organising institution, but even more to the needs and desires of the end user.

conclusionsIntegrated education is crucial to meet the conditions for efficient and effective continuing education. The ACHG KU Leuven decided to offer a postgraduate programme consisting of a combination of teaching methods: online courses (self-study), contact courses (traditional method) and a materials database.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingGuideline AdherenceBelgiumGeneral PractitionersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansProgram EvaluationEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID26850504
PMCPMC4819632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.