ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2016
Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular functions in patients with proximal right coronary artery chronic total occlusion.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery of right ventricular function and strain in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and concurrent chronic total occlusion.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Trial
- Non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction with "N" wave on electrocardiogram and culprit vessel in left circumflex has a risk equivalent to ST-elevated myocardial infarction.Clinical cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess right ventricular functions by echocardiography in patients with proximal right coronary artery (RCA) CTO and correlating it with clinical and angiographic variables. We studied 60 consecutive patients with CTO of the proximal RCA and no other significant lesions in the left coronary system. Echocardiography was performed in order to measure left ventricular (LV) dimensions, LVEF, RV end diastolic area (RVEDA), RV end systolic area (RVESA), RV fractional area change (RVFAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), Doppler myocardial performance index (MPI), trans-tricuspid E and A waves, E/A ratio, S', e' and a'. Grades of coronary collaterals was assessed. Doppler MPI showed negative correlation with TAPSE (r = -0.8997, p < 0.0001) and RVFAC (r = -0.928, p < 0.0001). Positive correlation with trans-tricuspid E/A ratio (r = 0.893, p < 0.0001) and E/e' ratio (r = 0.783, p < 0.0001). Patients with no evidence of MI had more well-developed (grade 3) coronary collaterals (83.8 vs. 17.4 %). Patients with evidence of MI had lower RVFAC 38.13 ± 5.39 versus 45.08 ± 4.99 % (p < 0.0001), lower TAPSE 20.17 ± 3.85 versus 25.35 ± 3.46 mm (p < 0.0001), higher MPI 0.4 ± 0.08 versus 0.31 ± 0.05 (p < 0.0001), higher trans-tricuspid E/A ratio 1.79 ± 0.38 versus 1.13 ± 0.36 (p < 0.0001) and E/e' ratio 5.23 ± 1.02 versus 3.61 ± 0.88 (p < 0.0001). Patients with poorly developed collaterals had lower TAPSE and RVFAC and a higher MPI (p < 0.0001 for each). Patients with proximal RCA CTOs and evidence of inferior wall MI have significant impairment of RV functions in addition to poorly developed coronary collaterals. Those with proximal RCA CTOs and well-developed coronary collaterals have better RV functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26850438What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.