ArticleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2016
White Paper on P4 Concepts for Pediatric Imaging.
Article in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are Routine Post-Cast Removal Radiographs and a Second Follow-up Appointment Necessary in the Management of Nondisplaced or Minimally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures?Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Article
- Radiation use in diagnostic imaging in children: approaching the value of the pediatric radiology community.Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- European Society of Paediatric Radiology 2019 strategic research agenda: improving imaging for tomorrow's children.Pediatric radiology · 2019Review
- Reducing sedation for pediatric body MRI using accelerated and abbreviated imaging protocols.Pediatric radiology · 2018Review
- Reducing Sedation for Pediatric Thoracic CT Imaging Using Volumetric Target-mode EKG Gating.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, innovations in the field of pediatric imaging have been based largely on single-center and retrospective studies, which provided limited advances for the benefit of pediatric patients. To identify opportunities for potential "quantum-leap" progress in the field of pediatric imaging, the ACR-Pediatric Imaging Research (PIR) Committee has identified high-impact research directions related to the P4 concept of predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory diagnosis and intervention. Input from 237 members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology was clustered around 10 priority areas, which are discussed in this article. Needs within each priority area have been analyzed in detail by ACR-PIR experts on these topics. By facilitating work in these priority areas, we hope to revolutionize the care of children by shifting our efforts from unilateral reaction to clinical symptoms, to interactive maintenance of child health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.