Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26850330›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2016

Rapid response teams improve outcomes: no.

Ritesh Maharaj, Henry T Stelfox

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Factors influencing the activation of the rapid response system for clinically deteriorating patients by frontline ward clinicians: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Unplanned admission or readmission to the intensive care unit : Avoidable or fateful?]Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Rapid response teams: how are they best used?Critical care (London, England) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ritesh MaharajDepartment of Intensive Care, Kings College London, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK. ritesh.maharaj@kcl.ac.uk.
Henry T StelfoxDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, T2N 5A14Z6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Hospital Rapid Response TeamQuality ImprovementHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.