Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26850264›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

A prospective randomized controlled study comparing the pain relief in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with the use of vertebroplasty or facet blocking.

Biao Wang, Hua Guo, Li Yuan, Dageng Huang, Haiping Zhang, Dingjun Hao

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03651804 (Radiofrequency Ablation of the Medial Branch Nerve as a Novel Treatment for Posterior Element Pain From Vertebral Compression Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03651804 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Radiofrequency Ablation of the Medial Branch Nerve as a Novel Treatment for Posterior Element Pain From Vertebral Compression Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2019 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsVertebral Compression Fracture, Facet Joint PainArmsRadiofrequency ablation of the medial branch nerves, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Bisphosphonates, Acetaminophen, Physical therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Clinical and radiological subsequent fractures after vertebral augmentation for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Lumbar Facet Joint Injection: A Review of Efficacy and Safety].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A nomogram for predicting residual low back pain after percutaneous kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Biao WangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, No. 76 Nanguo Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shanxi, China.
Hua GuoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, No. 76 Nanguo Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shanxi, China.
Li YuanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, No. 76 Nanguo Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shanxi, China.
Dageng HuangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, No. 76 Nanguo Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shanxi, China.
Haiping ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, No. 76 Nanguo Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shanxi, China.
Dingjun HaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, No. 76 Nanguo Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shanxi, China. dingjunhaowb@163.com.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNXi'an Honghui Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus those undergoing facet blocking (FB) for severe pain due to osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

methodsTwo hundred and six patients who had OVCFs on spine radiography and intractable back pain for ≤8 weeks were recruited between January 2009 and January 2013 (165 females and 41 males, age ≥55 years). Patients were randomly assigned to the PVP group (100 patients) or the FB group (106 patients). VAS, ODI, Roland Morris disability (RMD) scores, scores on the Standardized Physical Component of the SF-36 form (SPC) and scores on the Standardized Mental Component of the SF-36 form (SMC) were determined preoperatively and at each follow-up time (1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months). In addition, plain radiographs were obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively to detect new fractures.

resultsSignificantly lower VAS, ODI, and RMD scores for patients in the PVP group compared to those in the FB group were observed at follow-up of 1 day and 1 week (p < 0.05). However, differences in the VAS, ODI, RMD and SPC/MCS (SF-36) scores between the two groups at follow-ups of more than 1 month were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Difference in numbers of new fractures in the two groups at the follow-up of 12 months was also statistically insignificant.

conclusionsPVP produced better pain relief than FB in the short term (≤1 week). However, the difference in pain-relief between these two techniques was insignificant in the long term (follow-up between 1 month and 12 months).

Indexed as

Nerve BlockVertebroplastyZygapophyseal JointAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthetics, LocalBack PainDisability EvaluationFemaleFractures, CompressionGlucocorticoidsHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularIntractable PainLidocaineMaleAnesthetics, LocalGlucocorticoidsLidocainePrednisoloneFacet blockingOsteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF)Vertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID26850264
OpenAlexW2258799318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.