Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26849890›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2016

Pro-brain natriuretic peptide (ProBNP) levels in North Indian children with Kawasaki disease.

Mounika Reddy, Surjit Singh, Amit Rawat, Avinash Sharma, Deepti Suri, Manoj Kumar Rohit

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Controversies in diagnosis and management of Kawasaki disease.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2018
    Review
  14. Diagnosis of Kawasaki disease.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2018
    Review
  15. The emergence of Kawasaki disease in India and China.Global cardiology science & practice · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Diagnosing Incomplete Kawasaki Disease.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mounika ReddyDivision of Allergy-Immunology, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Surjit SinghDivision of Allergy-Immunology, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. surjitsinghpgi@rediffmail.com.
Amit RawatDivision of Allergy-Immunology, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Avinash SharmaDivision of Allergy-Immunology, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Deepti SuriDivision of Allergy-Immunology, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical, Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Manoj Kumar RohitDepartment of Cardiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of Kawasaki disease (KD), a common pediatric vasculitis, is based solely on clinical criteria. There is a need for a robust laboratory marker that can help differentiate KD from other acute, febrile, childhood illnesses and also to predict cardiac involvement. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 25 consecutive patients admitted with diagnosis of KD from January 2013 to April 2014 and compared them with age- and sex-matched febrile controls. We studied the serum pro-brain natriuretic peptide (ProBNP) [ProBNP and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) levels], a marker of myocardial dysfunction, in children with KD in acute and convalescent phases of disease. These levels were also estimated in febrile controls for comparison. The ProBNP (ProBNP and NT-ProBNP) levels were much higher in the acute phase of the KD patients compared to levels in the convalescent phase of KD (p = 0.000014). Similarly, the levels in the acute phase were higher when compared to the age- and sex-matched febrile controls (p = 0.000126). The receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis for the ProBNP levels in the acute phase of KD yielded an area under the curve of 0.954 ± 0.034 (p < 0.000, 95 % CI 0.886-1.0). Based on ROC analysis, a cutoff of 1025 pg/mL for ProBNP levels in the acute phase of KD had 88 % sensitivity and 96 % specificity for the diagnosis of KD. A lower cut-off of 514 pg/mL yielded a 100 % sensitivity and 80 % specificity for the diagnosis of KD. The ProBNP levels were higher in those with coronary artery abnormalities (CAA) compared to those without CAA in both acute (p = 0.013) and convalescent (p = 0.045) phases. ProBNP levels may be used as a surrogate marker for the differentiation of KD from other febrile, infectious illnesses and may also predict the involvement of coronary arteries.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCoronary Artery DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansIndiaInfantMaleMucocutaneous Lymph Node SyndromeNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Acute KDBiomarkerCoronary artery abnormalitiesPediatric vasculitis

Identifiers

PMID26849890
OpenAlexW2270682803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.