Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26849465›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2016

Time pressured deprioritization of COPD in primary care: a qualitative study.

Hanna Sandelowsky, Ingrid Hylander, Ingvar Krakau, Sonja Modin, Björn Ställberg, Anna Nager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. General practice management of COPD patients following acute exacerbations: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hanna Sandelowskya NVS, Section for Family Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Huddinge , Stockholm , Sweden ;
Ingrid Hylandera NVS, Section for Family Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Huddinge , Stockholm , Sweden ;
Ingvar Krakaua NVS, Section for Family Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Huddinge , Stockholm , Sweden ;
Sonja Modina NVS, Section for Family Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Huddinge , Stockholm , Sweden ;
Björn Ställbergb Department of Public Health and Caring Science, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Anna Nagera NVS, Section for Family Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Huddinge , Stockholm , Sweden ;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify factors that hinder discussions regarding chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) between primary care physicians (PCPs) and their patients in Sweden.

settingPrimary health care centres (PHCCs) in Stockholm, Sweden. SUBJECTS: A total of 59 PCPs.

designSemi-structured individual and focus-group interviews between 2012 and 2014. Data were analysed inspired by grounded theory methods (GTM).

resultsTime-pressured patient-doctor consultations lead to deprioritization of COPD. During unscheduled visits, deprioritization resulted from focusing only on acute health concerns, while during routine care visits, COPD was deprioritized in multi-morbid patients. The reasons PCPs gave for deprioritizing COPD are: "Not becoming aware of COPD", "Not becoming concerned due to clinical features", "Insufficient local routines for COPD care", "Negative personal attitudes and views about COPD", "Managing diagnoses one at a time", and "Perceiving a patient's motivation as low''.

conclusionsDe-prioritization of COPD was discovered during PCP consultations and several factors were identified associated with time constraints and multi-morbidity. A holistic consultation approach is suggested, plus extended consultation time for multi-morbid patients, and better documentation and local routines. KEY POINTS: Under-diagnosis and insufficient management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common in primary health care. A patient-doctor consultation offers a key opportunity to identify and provide COPD care. Time pressure, due to either high number of patients or multi-morbidity, leads to omission or deprioritization of COPD during consultation. Deprioritization occurs due to lack of awareness, concern, and local routines, negative personal views, non-holistic consultation approach, and low patient motivation. Better local routines, extended consultation time, and a holistic approach are needed when managing multi-morbid patients with COPD.

Indexed as

Health PrioritiesOffice VisitsPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareWorkloadAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelComorbidityFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsBarriersCOPDgeneral practiceguidelinemanagementmulti-morbidityprimary careprimary care physiciansqualitative study typeSweden

Identifiers

PMID26849465
PMCPMC4911027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.