Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26849442›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Direct Observation of Treatment Provided by a Family Member as Compared to Non-Family Member among Children with New Tuberculosis: A Pragmatic, Non-Inferiority, Cluster-Randomized Trial in Gujarat, India.

Paresh Vamanrao Dave, Amar Niranjan Shah, Pankaj B Nimavat, Bhavesh B Modi, Kirit R Pujara, Pradip Patel, Keshabhai Mehariya, Kiran Vaman Rade, Soma Shekar, Kuldeep S Sachdeva and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Family directly observed therapy for children with drug-resistant TB.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Paresh Vamanrao DaveDepartment of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Amar Niranjan ShahWHO country office for India, New Delhi, India.
Pankaj B NimavatDepartment of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Bhavesh B ModiDepartment of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Kirit R PujaraDepartment of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Pradip PatelDepartment of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Keshabhai MehariyaDepartment of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Kiran Vaman RadeWHO country office for India, New Delhi, India.
Soma ShekarNational Tuberculosis Institute, Government of India, Bangalore, India.
Kuldeep S SachdevaCentral TB Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
John E OeltmannU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Ajay M V KumarInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, South-East Asia Regional Office, New Delhi, India.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization recommends direct observation of treatment (DOT) to support patients with tuberculosis (TB) and to ensure treatment completion. As per national programme guidelines in India, a DOT provider can be anyone who is acceptable and accessible to the patient and accountable to the health system, except a family member. This poses challenges among children with TB who may be more comfortable receiving medicines from their parents or family members than from unfamiliar DOT providers. We conducted a non-inferiority trial to assess the effect of family DOT on treatment success rates among children with newly diagnosed TB registered for treatment during June-September 2012.

methodsWe randomly assigned all districts (n = 30) in Gujarat to the intervention (n = 15) or usual-practice group (n = 15). Adult family members in the intervention districts were given the choice to become their child's DOT provider. DOT was provided by a non-family member in the usual-practice districts. Using routinely collected clinic-based TB treatment cards, we compared treatment success rates (cured and treatment completed) between the two groups and the non-inferiority limit was kept at 5%.

resultsOf 624 children with newly diagnosed TB, 359 (58%) were from intervention districts and 265 (42%) were from usual-practice districts. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics including age, sex, type of TB, and initial body weight. The treatment success rates were 344 (95.8%) and 247 (93.2%) (p = 0.11) among the intervention and usual-practice groups respectively.

conclusionDOT provided by a family member is not inferior to DOT provided by a non-family member among new TB cases in children and can attain international targets for treatment success.

trial registrationClinical Trials Registry-India, National Institute of Medical Statistics (Indian Council of Medical Research) CTRI/2015/09/006229.

Indexed as

FamilyAdolescentAntitubercular AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDirectly Observed TherapyFemaleHumansIndiaInfantMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment OutcomeTuberculosisAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID26849442
PMCPMC4743945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.