Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26849304›Full record

ReviewCell stem cell2016

Stem and Progenitor Cell-Based Therapy of the Central Nervous System: Hopes, Hype, and Wishful Thinking.

Steven A Goldman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell stem cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven A GoldmanCenter for Translational Neuromedicine and the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA; Center for Basic and Translational Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark. Electronic address: steven_goldman@urmc.rochester.edu.

Funding

Regulation of adult human oligodendrocyte progenitorsR01NS039559 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GOLDMAN, STEVEN ALAN · 2000 to 2008
$3.0M
A Humanized Mouse Model of Astrocytic Pathology in SchizophreniaR01MH099578 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GOLDMAN, STEVEN ALAN, NEDERGAARD, MAIKEN · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
Angiogenic determinants of endogenous adult neurogenesisR37NS029813 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GOLDMAN, STEVEN ALAN · 2002 to 2008
$2.3M
An iPSC based humanized mouse model of dysmyelination in schizophreniaR01MH104701 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GOLDMAN, STEVEN ALAN · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
Induction of Striatal Regeneration in Huntington's DiseaseR01NS052534 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GOLDMAN, STEVEN ALAN · 2005 to 2009
$1.7M
Molecular Regulation of Human Glial Progenitor Cell-Based RemyelinationR01NS075345 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GOLDMAN, STEVEN ALAN · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
DETERMINANTS OF ADULT NEUROGENESIS AND MIGRATION IR01NS029813 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GOLDMAN, STEVEN A · 1997 to 2000
$211k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099578NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104701NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS029813NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039559NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052534NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075345NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS029813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of neurological disorders are attractive targets for stem and progenitor cell-based therapy. Yet many conditions are not, whether by virtue of an inhospitable disease environment, poorly understood pathophysiology, or poor alignment of donor cell capabilities with patient needs. Moreover, some disorders may be medically feasible targets but are not practicable, in light of already available treatments, poor risk-benefit and cost-benefit profiles, or resource limitations. This Perspective seeks to define those neurological conditions most appropriate for cell replacement therapy by considering its potential efficacy and clinical feasibility in those disorders, as well as potential impediments to its application.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCellular ReprogrammingCentral Nervous SystemCentral Nervous System DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceNerve DegenerationPhenotypeStem Cellsastrocytecell therapyglial progenitor cellmyelin diseaseneural stem cellneurodegenerative diseaseneurological therapeuticsoligodendrocyte progenitor cell

Identifiers

PMID26849304
PMCPMC5310249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.