Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26849238›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2016

Resynthesis of Brassica napus through hybridization between B. juncea and B. carinata.

Debamalya Chatterjee, Shashi Banga, Mehak Gupta, Sakshi Bharti, Phillip Anthony Salisbury, Surinder Singh Banga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Introgression of Heterotic Genomic Segments fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Production and cytology of Brassica autoallohexaploids with two and four copies of two subgenomes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  8. Challenges and prospects for a potential allohexaploid Brassica crop.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Debamalya ChatterjeeDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India.
Shashi BangaDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India.
Mehak GuptaDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India.
Sakshi BhartiDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India.
Phillip Anthony SalisburyInstitute of Land and Food Resources, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Surinder Singh BangaDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India. nppbg@pau.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8209-7341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageFirst report for the resynthesis of Brassica napus by recombining A and C genome from B. juncea and B. carinata , respectively. Also documents B genome introgressions in resynthesized B. napus. Resynthesis of Brassica napus (AACC) was achieved by hybridizing Brassica juncea (AABB) with Brassica carinata (BBCC). This was facilitated by spontaneous chromosome doubling in the F1 hybrid (ABBC) to yield octaploid (AABBBBCC), elimination of extra B genome chromosomes in the resulting octaploid and in subsequent selfed generations, aided with directed selection for fertile plants having B. napus morphology. Twenty-five plants with varying degrees of resemblance to natural B. napus were identified from 17 A5 progenies and assayed for cytogenetic stability and genetic diversity. Majority of these plants, except six (2n = 38) were hyperploids (2n = 40-56). The six plants with 2n = 38 were designated as derived B. napus types. These showed an expected meiotic configuration of 19II at metaphase-I, with 19-19 distribution at anaphase-I. Genotyping based on A and C genome specific primers confirmed genetic identity of six derived (2n = 38) B. napus plants with natural types whereas genotyping with B genome specific primers indicated introgression of B genome segments. This was also confirmed by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Strong signals of B genome probe were detected, proving hitherto unreported genetic exchanges between B and A/C chromosomes. These introgressions possibly occurred en route five generations of selfing. Derived plants yielded fertile hybrids in crosses with natural B. napus var. GSC 6. The selfed derived plants as evaluated in A6 plant to progeny rows were morphologically similar to natural B. napus, and meiotically stable. Agronomic assessment of these progenies revealed variation for key morpho-physiological traits. Of special interest were the progenies with plants having oil content exceeding 47% as against about 39-41% in existing cultivars.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticBrassica napusChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenotypeIn Situ HybridizationMustard PlantPlant BreedingPolyploidyDNA, Plant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.