Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26849041›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Colonization of Beef Cattle by Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli during the First Year of Life: A Cohort Study.

Raies A Mir, Thomas A Weppelmann, Mauricio Elzo, Soohyoun Ahn, J Danny Driver, KwangCheol Casey Jeong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity of Shiga-toxin-producingJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence and Implications of Shiga Toxin-ProducingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Persistent Circulation of EnterohemorrhagicFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Abundance and Expression of Shiga Toxin Genes inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. SupershedInternational journal of microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raies A MirDepartment of Animal Sciences, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Thomas A WeppelmannEmerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Mauricio ElzoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Soohyoun AhnFood Science and Human Nutrition Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
J Danny DriverDepartment of Animal Sciences, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
KwangCheol Casey JeongDepartment of Animal Sciences, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each year Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are responsible for 2.8 million acute illnesses around the world and > 250,000 cases in the US. Lowering the prevalence of this pathogen in animal reservoirs has the potential to reduce STEC outbreaks in humans by controlling its entrance into the food chain. However, factors that modulate the colonization and persistence of STEC in beef cattle remain largely unidentified. This study evaluated if animal physiological factors such as age, breed, sex, and weight gain influenced the shedding of STEC in beef cattle. A cohort of beef calves (n = 260) from a multi-breed beef calf population was sampled every three months after birth to measure prevalence and concentration of STEC during the first year of life. Metagenomic analysis was also used to understand the association between the STEC colonization and the composition of gut microflora. This study identified that beef calves were more likely to shed STEC during the first 6 months and that STEC shedding decreased as the animal matured. Animal breed group, sex of the calf, and average weight gain were not significantly associated with STEC colonization. The metagenomic analysis revealed for the first time that STEC colonization was correlated with a lower diversity of gut microflora, which increases as the cattle matured. Given these findings, intervention strategies that segregate younger animals, more likely to be colonized by STEC from older animals that are ready to be harvested, could be investigated as a method to reduce zoonotic transmission of STEC from cattle to humans.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsBacterial SheddingBody WeightCattleCattle DiseasesDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli InfectionsFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLogistic ModelsMaleSex FactorsShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26849041
PMCPMC4743843
OpenAlexW2260591131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.