ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2016
Nonthermal ablation in the rat brain using focused ultrasound and an ultrasound contrast agent: long-term effects.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transient tumor perfusion loss: evaluating the spatial and temporal dynamics of blood flow changes induced by ultrasound cavitation treatments.Ultrasonics · 2026Article
- Focused Ultrasound-Induced Mechanical Ablation Affects the Carbohydrate Metabolism of Residual/Peri-Focally Localized Glioblastoma Cells.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- A Magnetic Resonance-Compatible Fiberoptic Temperature Sensor for Measuring Focused Ultrasound-Induced Heating Without Artifacts.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2026Article
- Rigid Hollow Microparticles for Enhanced Focused Ultrasound Treatment Under Optoacoustic Guidance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Comparative effects of focused ultrasound and microbubbles on healthy and tumor bearing rat spinal cord.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intravital imaging and cavitation monitoring of antivascular ultrasound in tumor microvasculature.Theranostics · 2023Article
- Theranostics in the vasculature: bioeffects of ultrasound and microbubbles to induce vascular shutdown.Theranostics · 2023Review
- The roles of thermal and mechanical stress in focused ultrasound-mediated immunomodulation and immunotherapy for central nervous system tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Review
- Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for Brain Tumors.Neuromolecular medicine · 2022Review
- Microbubble-Enhanced Heating: Exploring the Effect of Microbubble Concentration and Pressure Amplitude on High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatments.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2021Article
- Ultrafast three-dimensional microbubble imagingTheranostics · 2020Article
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI Evaluation on the Long-Term Effects of Pulsed Focused Ultrasound and Microbubbles Blood Brain Barrier Opening in the Rat.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Intracranial Non-thermal Ablation Mediated by Transcranial Focused Ultrasound and Phase-Shift Nanoemulsions.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2019Article
- For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2019Review
- Colloids, nanoparticles, and materials for imaging, delivery, ablation, and theranostics by focused ultrasound (FUS).Theranostics · 2019Review
- MRI and histological evaluation of pulsed focused ultrasound and microbubbles treatment effects in the brain.Theranostics · 2018Article
- MR-guided transcranial focused ultrasound safely enhances interstitial dispersion of large polymeric nanoparticles in the living brain.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Thermal ablation with transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) is currently under investigation as a less invasive alternative to radiosurgery and resection. A major limitation of the method is that its use is currently restricted to centrally located brain targets. The combination of FUS and a microbubble-based ultrasound contrast agent greatly reduces the ultrasound exposure level needed to ablate brain tissue and could be an effective means to increase the "treatment envelope" for FUS in the brain. This method, however, ablates tissue through a different mechanism: destruction of the microvasculature. It is not known whether nonthermal FUS ablation in substantial volumes of tissue can safely be performed without unexpected effects. The authors investigated this question by ablating volumes in the brains of normal rats. METHODS Overlapping sonications were performed in rats (n = 15) to ablate a volume in 1 hemisphere per animal. The sonications (10-msec bursts at 1 Hz for 60 seconds; peak negative pressure 0.8 MPa) were combined with the ultrasound contrast agent Optison (100 µl/kg). The rats were followed with MRI for 4-9 weeks after FUS, and the brains were examined with histological methods. RESULTS Two weeks after sonication and later, the lesions appeared as cyst-like areas in T2-weighted MR images that were stable over time. Histological examination demonstrated well-defined lesions consisting of a cyst-like cavity that remained lined by astrocytic tissue. Some white matter structures within the sonicated area were partially intact. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that nonthermal FUS ablation can be used to safely ablate tissue volumes in the brain without unexpected delayed effects. The findings are encouraging for the use of this ablation method in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.