Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26848859›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2016

Modeling the dyadic effects of parenting, stress, and coping on parent-child communication in families tested for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer risk.

Jada G Hamilton, Darren Mays, Tiffani DeMarco, Kenneth P Tercyak

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jada G HamiltonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Darren MaysDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Tiffani DeMarcoDivision of Medical Genomics, Inova Translational Medicine Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Kenneth P TercyakDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. tercyakk@georgetown.edu.
Georgetown University · USInova Fairfax Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Parent Communication of BRCA1/2 Test Results to ChildrenR01HG002686 · NHGRI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TERCYAK, KENNETH · 2003 to 2009
$3.1M
BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN PUBLIC HEALTH GENETICSK18HG006754 · NHGRI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TERCYAK, KENNETH · 2011 to 2011
$89k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NHGRI NIH HHS K18 HG006754NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing for BRCA genes, associated with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer risk, is an accepted cancer control strategy. BRCA genetic testing has both medical and psychosocial implications for individuals seeking testing and their family members. However, promoting open and adaptive communication about cancer risk in the family is challenging for parents of minor children. Using prospective data collected from mothers undergoing BRCA genetic testing and their untested co-parents (N = 102 parenting dyads), we examined how maternal and co-parent characteristics independently and conjointly influenced the overall quality of parent-child communication with minor children. Statistical associations were tested in accordance with the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Significant Actor effects were observed among mothers, such that open parent-child communication prior to genetic testing was positively associated with open communication 6 months following receipt of genetic test results; and among co-parents, more open parent-child communication at baseline and greater perceived quality of the parenting relationship were associated with more open parent-child communication at follow-up. Partner effects were also observed: co-parents' baseline communication and confidence in their ability to communicate with their minor children about genetic testing was positively associated with open maternal parent-child communication at follow-up. These results demonstrate that for families facing the prospect of cancer genetic testing, perceptions and behaviors of both members of child-rearing couples have important implications for the overall quality of communication with their minor children, including communication about cancer risk.

Indexed as

Parent-Child RelationsStress, PsychologicalAdaptation, PsychologicalBreast NeoplasmsChildEducational StatusFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalMothersOvarian NeoplasmsParentingPsychology, ChildBRCA genetic testingCancerDyadic data analysisFamily communication

Identifiers

PMID26848859
PMCPMC4982835
OpenAlexW2252566311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.