Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26848852›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Vision in Flies: Measuring the Attention Span.

Sebastian Koenig, Reinhard Wolf, Martin Heisenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Perceptual rivalry across animal species.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2020
    Review
  4. A Target-Detecting Visual Neuron in the Dragonfly Locks on to Selectively Attended Targets.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Attention-like processes in insects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian KoenigRudolf-Virchow-Center, Joseph-Schneider-Strasse 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Reinhard WolfRudolf-Virchow-Center, Joseph-Schneider-Strasse 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Martin HeisenbergRudolf-Virchow-Center, Joseph-Schneider-Strasse 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A visual stimulus at a particular location of the visual field may elicit a behavior while at the same time equally salient stimuli in other parts do not. This property of visual systems is known as selective visual attention (SVA). The animal is said to have a focus of attention (FoA) which it has shifted to a particular location. Visual attention normally involves an attention span at the location to which the FoA has been shifted. Here the attention span is measured in Drosophila. The fly is tethered and hence has its eyes fixed in space. It can shift its FoA internally. This shift is revealed using two simultaneous test stimuli with characteristic responses at their particular locations. In tethered flight a wild type fly keeps its FoA at a certain location for up to 4s. Flies with a mutation in the radish gene, that has been suggested to be involved in attention-like mechanisms, display a reduced attention span of only 1s.

Indexed as

Visual PerceptionAnimalsAttentionChoice BehaviorDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleMutationPhosphoproteinsPhotic StimulationProbabilityDrosophila ProteinsPhosphoproteinsrad protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID26848852
PMCPMC4744059
OpenAlexW2273307634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.