ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016
Molecular Pathological Classification of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Turning towards Precision Medicine.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
137 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 308 citations in OpenAlex.
- Air pollution: a latent key driving force of dementia.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Physical exercise and its effects on people with Parkinson's disease: Umbrella review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Alpha-Synuclein Strain Variability in Body-First and Brain-First Synucleinopathies.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Similarities and Differences in the Pattern of Tau Hyperphosphorylation in Physiological and Pathological Conditions: Impacts on the Elaboration of Therapies to Prevent Tau Pathology.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Pooled it
- Movement Disorders in Prionopathies: A Systematic Review.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Pooled it
- Neural correlates of altered insight in frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019Pooled it
- Olfactory dysfunction as a marker of neurodegenerative disease in older adults.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Article
- Review
- Psychobiotics at the Frontiers of Neurodegenerative and Neuropsychiatric Research.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Noradrenergic Slow Vasomotion: The Hidden Fluid Pump Linking Sleep, Brain Clearance, and Dementia Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles: Can They Revolutionize the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Disorders?Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells in neurodegenerative diseases.World journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Immunization targeting diseased proteins in synucleinopathy and tauopathy: insights from clinical trials.Translational neurodegeneration · 2025Review
- Effects of sleep on the glymphatic functioning and multimodal human brain network affecting memory in older adults.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Article
- Astaxanthin as a neuroprotective modulator of synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory: mechanistic insights and therapeutic perspectives in neurodegenerative aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
- Virus-like Particles-based Vaccine to Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
- Current Status and Future Perspective of Seoul National University Hospital-Dementia Brain Bank with Concordance of Clinical and Neuropathological Diagnosis.Experimental neurobiology · 2024Article
- Exploration of Novel Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Diseases Using Proteomic Analysis and Ligand-Binding Assays.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Two novel DnaJ chaperone proteins CG5001 and P58IPK regulate the pathogenicity of Huntington's disease related aggregates.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Redox Homeostasis, Gut Microbiota, and Epigenetics in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) are characterized by selective dysfunction and loss of neurons associated with pathologically altered proteins that deposit in the human brain but also in peripheral organs. These proteins and their biochemical modifications can be potentially targeted for therapy or used as biomarkers. Despite a plethora of modifications demonstrated for different neurodegeneration-related proteins, such as amyloid-β, prion protein, tau, α-synuclein, TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), or fused in sarcoma protein (FUS), molecular classification of NDDs relies on detailed morphological evaluation of protein deposits, their distribution in the brain, and their correlation to clinical symptoms together with specific genetic alterations. A further facet of the neuropathology-based classification is the fact that many protein deposits show a hierarchical involvement of brain regions. This has been shown for Alzheimer and Parkinson disease and some forms of tauopathies and TDP-43 proteinopathies. The present paper aims to summarize current molecular classification of NDDs, focusing on the most relevant biochemical and morphological aspects. Since the combination of proteinopathies is frequent, definition of novel clusters of patients with NDDs needs to be considered in the era of precision medicine. Optimally, neuropathological categorizing of NDDs should be translated into in vivo detectable biomarkers to support better prediction of prognosis and stratification of patients for therapy trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.