ArticleOncotarget2016
Intratumoral KIT mutational heterogeneity and recurrent KIT/ PDGFRA mutations in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rare Molecular Variants of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): Clinical Implications and Overview of Current Evidence.Targeted oncology · 2026Review
- Identification of divergent PTPN11 mutations in canine histiocytic sarcomas reveals evidence of an independent clonal origin.PloS one · 2026Article
- Advances in Drug Therapy for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Unexpected reaction of "wild-type" gastrointestinal stromal tumor to imatinib: case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GISTs) with KRAS Mutation: A Rare but Important Subset of GISTs.Case reports in gastrointestinal medicine · 2023Article
- Intratumoral heterogeneity of c-KIT mutations in a feline splenic mast cell tumor and their functional effects on cell proliferation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Targeted Deep Sequencing Reveals Unrecognized KIT Mutation Coexistent with NF1 Deficiency in GISTs.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Identification of a GNE homozygous mutation in a Han-Chinese family with GNE myopathy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2018Article
- Comprehensive molecular screening by next generation sequencing reveals a distinctive mutational profile ofESMO open · 2018Article
- Chinese consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with no mutations in exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 of the KIT gene and exons 12, and 18 of the PDGFRA gene were defined as KIT/PDGFRA wild-type and they accounted for ~15-20% of GISTs. However, some KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs with KIT mutations in other exons were occasionally reported. We therefore assessed GISTs to understand the whole genomic genotypes of KIT or PDGFRA genes in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs.
methodsA cohort of 185 KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs from 1,080 cases was retrospectively assessed. Thirty-nine patients were excluded due to insufficiency of genomic DNA data or failure of library preparation, and 146 patients were analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) followed by validation.
resultsFor hot spots in KIT and PDGFRA genes, 23 out of 146 KIT/PDGFRA wild-type cases carried mutations according to NGS; there were 19 KIT mutations and 4 PDGFRA mutations, and these were exclusive. Intratumoral KIT mutational heterogeneity was observed in 4 of 19 samples which potentially triggered mechanisms of polyclonal evolution and metastasis and drug sensitivity. Eleven patients treated with imatinib were evaluable for clinical response, and 2 of 3 patients with KIT mutations achieved partial response (PR), while only 1 of 8 patients without KIT mutations reached PR.
conclusionNGS had the potential property to identify partial mutant tumors from a subset of GISTs regarded as KIT/PDGFRA wild-type tumors using Sanger sequencing, and provided a better understanding of KIT/PDGFRA genotypes as well as identified patients eligible for imatinib therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.