Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26848609›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2016

An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Workshop Report: Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanics and Function in the Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

Stacey Peterson-Carmichael, Paul C Seddon, Ira M Cheifetz, Inéz Frerichs, Graham L Hall, Jürg Hammer, Zoltán Hantos, Anton H van Kaam, Cindy T McEvoy, Christopher J L Newth and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulmonary function tests in the neonatal intensive care unit and beyond: a clinical review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Comparison of Efficacy and Pharmacoeconomic Outcomes Between Calfactant and Poractant Alfa in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Clinical significance and applications of oscillometry.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Airway Resistance and Respiratory Compliance in Children with Acute Viral Bronchiolitis Requiring Mechanical Ventilation Support.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacey Peterson-Carmichael
Paul C Seddon
Ira M Cheifetz
Inéz Frerichs
Graham L Hall
Jürg Hammer
Zoltán Hantos
Anton H van Kaam
Cindy T McEvoy
Christopher J L Newth
J Jane Pillow
Gerrard F Rafferty
Margaret Rosenfeld
Janet Stocks
Sarath C Ranganathan
ATS/ERS Working Group on Infant and Young Children Pulmonary Function Testing
Sesame Workshop · US

Funding

VitC to Decrease Effects of Smoking in Pregnancy on Infant Lung Function-CCC-LeadR01HL105447 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MCEVOY, CYNTHIA T · 2012 to 2021
$9.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ready access to physiologic measures, including respiratory mechanics, lung volumes, and ventilation/perfusion inhomogeneity, could optimize the clinical management of the critically ill pediatric or neonatal patient and minimize lung injury. There are many techniques for measuring respiratory function in infants and children but very limited information on the technical ease and applicability of these tests in the pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit (PICU, NICU) environments. This report summarizes the proceedings of a 2011 American Thoracic Society Workshop critically reviewing techniques available for ventilated and spontaneously breathing infants and children in the ICU. It outlines for each test how readily it is performed at the bedside and how it may impact patient management as well as indicating future areas of potential research collaboration. From expert panel discussions and literature reviews, we conclude that many of the techniques can aid in optimizing respiratory support in the PICU and NICU, quantifying the effect of therapeutic interventions, and guiding ventilator weaning and extubation. Most techniques now have commercially available equipment for the PICU and NICU, and many can generate continuous data points to help with ventilator weaning and other interventions. Technical and validation studies in the PICU and NICU are published for the majority of techniques; some have been used as outcome measures in clinical trials, but few have been assessed specifically for their ability to improve clinical outcomes. Although they show considerable promise, these techniques still require further study in the PICU and NICU together with increased availability of commercial equipment before wider incorporation into daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, PediatricRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory MechanicsCapnographyCritical CareElectric ImpedanceEuropeHumansLung Volume MeasurementsPoint-of-Care TestingPulmonary MedicineSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesVentilation-Perfusion RatioVentilator Weaning

Identifiers

PMID26848609
PMCPMC5461957
OpenAlexW2263707235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.