Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26848265›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2016

The crossroads of anxiety: distinct neurophysiological maps for different symptomatic groups.

Montserrat Gerez, Enrique Suárez, Carlos Serrano, Lauro Castanedo, Armando Tello

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Montserrat GerezDepartamento de Neurofisiología Clínica, Hospital Español de México, Mexico City, Mexico; Departamento de Psiquiatría, Hospital Español de México, Mexico City, Mexico; Unidad de Postgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12 159-175.
Enrique SuárezDepartamento de Psiquiatría, Hospital Español de México, Mexico City, Mexico; Unidad de Postgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12 159-175.
Carlos SerranoDepartamento de Psiquiatría, Hospital Español de México, Mexico City, Mexico; Unidad de Postgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12 159-175.
Lauro CastanedoDepartamento de Psiquiatría, Hospital Español de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Armando TelloDepartamento de Neurofisiología Clínica, Hospital Español de México, Mexico City, Mexico; Unidad de Postgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2016:12 159-175.
Hospital Español · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the devastating impact of anxiety disorders (ADs) worldwide, long-lasting debates on causes and remedies have not solved the clinician's puzzle: who should be treated and how? Psychiatric classifications conceptualize ADs as distinct entities, with strong support from neuroscience fields. Yet, comorbidity and pharmacological response suggest a single "serotonin dysfunction" dimension. Whether AD is one or several disorders goes beyond academic quarrels, and the distinction has therapeutic relevance. Addressing the underlying dysfunctions should improve treatment response. By its own nature, neurophysiology can be the best tool to address dysfunctional processes. PURPOSE: To search for neurophysiological dysfunctions and differences among panic disorder (PD), agoraphobia-social-specific phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and generalized anxiety disorder.

methodsA sample population of 192 unmedicated patients and 30 aged-matched controls partook in this study. Hypothesis-related neurophysiological variables were combined into ten independent factors: 1) dysrhythmic patterns, 2) delta, 3) theta, 4) alpha, 5) beta (whole-head absolute power z-scores), 6) event-related potential (ERP) combined latency, 7) ERP combined amplitude (z-scores), 8) magnitude, 9) site, and 10) site of hyperactive networks. Combining single variables into representative factors was necessary because, as in all real-life phenomena, the complexity of interactive processes cannot be addressed through single variables and the multiplicity of potentially implicated variables would demand an extremely large sample size for statistical analysis.

resultsThe nonparametric analysis correctly classified 81% of the sample. Dysrhythmic patterns, decreased delta, and increased beta differentiated AD from controls. Shorter ERP latencies were found in several individual patients, mostly from the OCD group. Hyperactivities were found at the right frontorbital-striatal network in OCD and at the panic circuit in PD.

conclusionsOur findings support diffuse cortical instability in AD in general, with individual differences in information processing deficits and regional hyperactivities in OCD and PD. Study limitations and the rationale behind the variable selection and combination strategy will be discussed before addressing the therapeutic implications of our findings.

Indexed as

anxiety disordersdysrhythmicEEGepileptiformERPLORETA

Identifiers

PMID26848265
PMCPMC4723020
OpenAlexW2309006552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.