ReviewEuropean heart journal2017
Choosing a particular oral anticoagulant and dose for stroke prevention in individual patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: part 2.
Review in European heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Prior Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Outcomes and drivers of inappropriate dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Overview of Systematic Reviews.Drug safety · 2019Pooled it
- Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: 2018 update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018Guideline
- [Guidelines from the DOG, RG and BVA: retinal artery occlusion : November 2016 status].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017Guideline
- Early apixaban therapy after ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.Journal of neurology · 2021Trial
- Identifying clinical feature clusters toward predicting stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.International journal of data science and analytics · 2025Article
- Timing of oral anticoagulation in acute ischaemic stroke and non-valvular atrial fibrillation: early, 'timely' or late?Open heart · 2024Article
- Bleeding Complications of Anticoagulation Therapy in Clinical Practice-Epidemiology and Management: Review of the Literature.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Multidisciplinary Approach in Atrial Fibrillation: As Good as Gold.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Pattern of oral anticoagulant prescribing for atrial fibrillation in general practice: an observational study in The Netherlands.BJGP open · 2023Article
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Special Populations: Beyond the Clinical Trials.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- JCS/JHRS 2020 Guideline on Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias.Journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
- Trends of use and factors that determine the choice of oral anticoagulants in women and men with atrial fibrillation.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2022Article
- Nine-Year Trends in Prevention of Thromboembolic Complications in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with NOACs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Risk factors for emergency department revisit in elderly patients with gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to anticoagulant therapy.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022Observational
- Review
- Optimizing adherence and persistence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Atrial fibrillation: a geriatric perspective on the 2020 ESC guidelines.European geriatric medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The choice of oral anticoagulant (OAC) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) may be influenced by individual clinical features or by patterns of risk factors and comorbidities. We reviewed analyses of subgroups of patients from trials of vitamin K antagonists vs. non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention in AF with the aim to identify patient groups who might benefit from a particular OAC more than from another. In addition, we discuss the timing of initiation of anticoagulation. In the second of a two-part review, we discuss the use of NOAC for stroke prevention in the following subgroups of patients with AF: (vii) secondary stroke prevention in patients after stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), (viii) patients with acute stroke requiring thrombolysis or thrombectomy, (ix) those initiating or restarting OAC treatment after stroke or TIA, (x) those with renal impairment on dialysis, (xi) the elderly, (xii) those at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, and (xiii) those with hypertension. In addition, we discuss adherence and compliance. Finally, we present a summary of treatment suggestions. In specific subgroups of patients with AF, evidence supports the use of particular NOACs and/or particular doses of anticoagulant. The appropriate choice of treatment for these subgroups will help to promote optimal clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.