Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26848117›Full record

Trial reportActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2016

Bed-sharing by breastfeeding mothers: who bed-shares and what is the relationship with breastfeeding duration?

Helen L Ball, Denise Howel, Andy Bryant, Elspeth Best, Charlotte Russell, Martin Ward-Platt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ABM Clinical Protocol #37: Physiological Infant Care-Managing Nighttime Breastfeeding in Young Infants.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Bed sharing versus no bed sharing for healthy term neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. An evolutionary perspective on night terrors.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Helen L BallParent-Infant Sleep Lab, Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2255-121X
Denise HowelInstitute of Health and Society, Baddiley Clark building, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Andy BryantInstitute of Health and Society, Baddiley Clark building, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Elspeth BestDepartment of Paediatrics, St John's Hospital, Howden, Lothian, Scotland.
Charlotte RussellParent-Infant Sleep Lab, Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Martin Ward-PlattNewcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Durham University · GBNewcastle University · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBSt John's Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0706-10618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the link between breastfeeding duration and bed-sharing frequency among women reporting a prenatal intention to breastfeed.

methodsAbout 870 participants in a randomised breastfeeding trial, recruited at mid-pregnancy, provided weekly snapshots of breastfeeding and bed-sharing behaviour for 26 weeks following birth. Strength of prenatal breastfeeding intent was recorded at recruitment using Likert-type scales.

resultsOutcomes were frequency of bed-sharing at home for at least one hour per week, and time to cessation of breastfeeding. There were insufficient data to classify bed-sharing pattern in 192/870 (22%) of mothers. Of the remainder, 44% (299/678) of participants 'rarely' or 'never' bed-shared, 28% (192/678) did so 'intermittently' and 28% (187/678) did so 'often'. These three groups did not differ significantly in marital status, income, infant gestational age, maternal age or delivery mode. Significantly, more participants who bed-shared 'often' reported strong prenatal breastfeeding intent (70% vs. 57% and 56% for 'intermittent' and 'rare' bed-share groups) and attached high prenatal importance to breastfeeding (95% vs. 87% and 82%). Significantly, more women who bed-shared frequently were breastfeeding at 6 months (p < 0.0001) than those who intermittently or rarely/never bed-shared.

conclusionWomen with strong motivation to breastfeed frequently bed-share. Given the complex relationship between bed-sharing and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) appropriate guidance balancing risk minimisation with support for breastfeeding mothers is crucial.

Indexed as

BedsBreast FeedingAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornSocioeconomic FactorsBed-sharingBreastfeedingBreastfeeding intentCo-sleepingSIDS, sudden infant death syndrome

Identifiers

PMID26848117
OpenAlexW2302858886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.