Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26848051›Full record

ArticleErgonomics2016

Measuring elemental time and duty cycle using automated video processing.

Oguz Akkas, Cheng-Hsien Lee, Yu Hen Hu, Thomas Y Yen, Robert G Radwin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ergonomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oguz Akkasa Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison , WI , USA.
Cheng-Hsien Leeb Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison , WI , USA.
Yu Hen Hub Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison , WI , USA.
Thomas Y Yena Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison , WI , USA.
Robert G Radwina Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison , WI , USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

University of Michigan ERC-supplement (TRT)T42OH008455 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NEITZEL, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2025
$32.3M
A Direct Reading Video Assessment Instrument for Repetitive Motion StressR01OH011024 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RADWIN, ROBERT G · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
Video Exposure Assessment of Hand Activity LevelR21OH010221 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RADWIN, ROBERT G · 2012 to 2013
$402k
Video Motion Analysis of Repetitive ExertionsR21EB014583 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RADWIN, ROBERT G · 2012 to 2013
$391k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB014583NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH011024NIOSH CDC HHS R21 OH010221NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A marker-less 2D video algorithm measured hand kinematics (location, velocity and acceleration) in a paced repetitive laboratory task for varying hand activity levels (HAL). The decision tree (DT) algorithm identified the trajectory of the hand using spatiotemporal relationships during the exertion and rest states. The feature vector training (FVT) method utilised the k-nearest neighbourhood classifier, trained using a set of samples or the first cycle. The average duty cycle (DC) error using the DT algorithm was 2.7%. The FVT algorithm had an average 3.3% error when trained using the first cycle sample of each repetitive task, and had a 2.8% average error when trained using several representative repetitive cycles. Error for HAL was 0.1 for both algorithms, which was considered negligible. Elemental time, stratified by task and subject, were not statistically different from ground truth (p < 0.05). Both algorithms performed well for automatically measuring elapsed time, DC and HAL. Practitioner Summary: A completely automated approach for measuring elapsed time and DC was developed using marker-less video tracking and the tracked kinematic record. Such an approach is automatic, repeatable, objective and unobtrusive, and is suitable for evaluating repetitive exertions, muscle fatigue and manual tasks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTask Performance and AnalysisVideo RecordingAccelerationBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHandHumansMaleMovementMuscle Fatigueexposure assessmentRepetitive motiontime and motion studywork-related musculoskeletal disorders

Identifiers

PMID26848051
PMCPMC5226076
OpenAlexW2291504148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.