ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings2016
Centromedian-Parafascicular Complex Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Target-Specific Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- From lobotomy to connectomics: a critical review of contemporary psychosurgery.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Review
- Deep brain stimulation, lesioning, focused ultrasound: update on utility.AIMS neuroscience · 2023Review
- The intralaminar thalamus: a review of its role as a target in functional neurosurgery.Brain communications · 2023Review
- European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders-version 2.0. Part IV: deep brain stimulation.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2022Review
- Therapeutic Neurostimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Clinical applications of neurochemical and electrophysiological measurements for closed-loop neurostimulation.Neurosurgical focus · 2020Article
- Advances in neurochemical measurements: A review of biomarkers and devices for the development of closed-loop deep brain stimulation systems.Reviews in analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Deep brain stimulation for Tourette's syndrome.Translational neurodegeneration · 2020Review
- Imaging the Centromedian Thalamic Nucleus Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Deep brain stimulation in Tourette's syndrome: evidence to date.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2019Review
- Global network modulation during thalamic stimulation for Tourette syndrome.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Article
- The Use of Deep Brain Stimulation in Tourette Syndrome.Brain sciences · 2016Review
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette's Syndrome: The Case for Targeting the Thalamic Centromedian-Parafascicular Complex.Frontiers in neurology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic centromedian/parafascicular (CM-Pf) complex has been reported as a promising treatment for patients with severe, treatment-resistant Tourette syndrome (TS). In this study, safety and clinical outcomes of bilateral thalamic CM-Pf DBS were reviewed in a series of 12 consecutive patients with medically refractory TS, 11 of whom met the criteria of postsurgical follow-up at our institution for at least 2 months. Five patients were followed for a year or longer. Consistent with many patients with TS, all patients had psychiatric comorbidities. Tic severity and frequency were measured by using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) over time (average, 26 months) in 10 subjects. One patient was tested at 2-week follow-up only and thus was excluded from group YGTSS analysis. Final YGTSS scores differed significantly from the preoperative baseline score. The average (n=10) improvement relative to baseline in the total score was 54% (95% CI, 37-70); average improvement relative to baseline in the YGTSS Motor tic, Phonic tic, and Impairment subtests was 46% (95% CI, 34-64), 52% (95% CI, 34-72), and 59% (95% CI, 39-78), respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. After surgery, 1 subject underwent wound revision because of a scalp erosion and wound infection; the implanted DBS system was successfully salvaged with surgical revision and combined antibiotic therapy. Stimulation-induced adverse effects did not prevent the use of the DBS system, although 1 subject is undergoing a trial period with the stimulator off. This surgical series adds to the literature on CM-Pf DBS and supports its use as an effective and safe therapeutic option for severe refractory TS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.