Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26847793›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Genomic analysis of the nitrate-respiring Sphingopyxis granuli (formerly Sphingomonas macrogoltabida) strain TFA.

Inmaculada García-Romero, Antonio J Pérez-Pulido, Yolanda Elisabet González-Flores, Francisca Reyes-Ramírez, Eduardo Santero, Belén Floriano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Adaptive Evolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inmaculada García-RomeroCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, ES-41013, Seville, Spain. igarrom@upo.es.
Antonio J Pérez-PulidoCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, ES-41013, Seville, Spain. ajperez@upo.es.
Yolanda Elisabet González-FloresCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, ES-41013, Seville, Spain. yegonflo@upo.es.
Francisca Reyes-RamírezCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, ES-41013, Seville, Spain. freyram@upo.es.
Eduardo SanteroCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, ES-41013, Seville, Spain. esansan@upo.es.
Belén FlorianoCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, ES-41013, Seville, Spain. bflopar@upo.es.
Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSphingomonads are Alphaproteobacteria that belong to the Sphingomonas, Novosphingobium, Sphingopyxis or Sphingobium genera, They are physiologically diverse and broadly distributed in nature, playing important roles in oligotrophic environments and in the degradation of recalcitrant polyaromatic compounds, Sphingopyxis is a poorly studied genus of which only one representative (S. alaskensis RB2256) has been deeply characterized. In this paper we analyze the genomic features of S. granuli strain TFA (formerly Sphingomonas macrogoltabida) in comparison with the available Sphingopyxis sequenced genomes, to describe common characteristics of this genus and to highlight unique characteristics of strain TFA.

resultsThe TFA genome has been assembled in a single circular chromosome of 4.7 Mb. Genomic sequence analysis and proteome comparison re-assigned the TFA strain to the Sphingopyxis genus and the S. granuli species. Some regions of the TFA genome show high similarity (ca. 100%) to other bacteria and several genomic islands have been detected. Pathways for aromatic compound degradation have been predicted but no growth of TFA has been detected using these as carbon or nitrogen sources. Genes for nitrate respiration have been identified as TFA exclusive. Experimental data on anaerobic growth of TFA using nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor are also provided.

conclusionsSphingopyxis representatives form a compact phylogenetic group (with the exception of S. baekryungensis DSM 16222) that share several characteristics, such as being naturally resistant to streptomycin, having only one ribosomal operon, a low number of prophages and CRISPR sequences, absence of selenoproteins and presence of ectoin and other biosynthesis pathways for secondary metabolites. Moreover, the TFA genome organization shows evidence of the presence of putative integrative and conjugative elements (ICE) responsible for the acquisition of several characteristics by horizontal transfer mechanisms. Sphingopyxis representatives have been described as strict aerobes but anaerobic growth using nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor might confer an environmental advantage to the first S. granuli strain characterized at genomic level.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsBacteriophagesChromosomes, BacterialComputational BiologyGene Transfer, HorizontalGenomic IslandsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNitratesPhylogenyProteomeProteomicsSecondary MetabolismSequence Analysis, DNASphingomonasNitratesProteome

Identifiers

PMID26847793
PMCPMC4741004
OpenAlexW2266808597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.