ArticleBiomedical engineering online2016
Automatic screening of cervical cells using block image processing.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for colposcopic and cytological image analysis in early cervical cancer detection.iScience · 2026Review
- Machine and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Fine-grained pathomorphology recognition of cervical lesions with a dropped multibranch Swin Transformer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-driven Digital Cytology-based Cervical Cancer Screening: Is the Time Ripe to Adopt This Disruptive Technology in Resource-constrained Settings? A Literature Review.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Review
- Dual supervised sampling networks for real-time segmentation of cervical cell nucleus.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- A screening assistance system for cervical cytology of squamous cell atypia based on a two-step combined CNN algorithm with label smoothing.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence and the future of global health.Lancet (London, England) · 2020Review
- A Microfluidic Detection System for Bladder Cancer Tumor Cells.Micromachines · 2019Article
- Cervical cell recognition based on AGVF-Snake algorithm.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019Article
- A Review of Computational Methods for Cervical Cells Segmentation and Abnormality Classification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- A preliminary cervical cancer screening cascade for eight provinces rural Chinese women: a descriptive analysis of cervical cancer screening cases in a 3-stage framework.Chinese medical journal · 2019Article
- Label-free microfluidic chip for the identification of mesothelial cell clusters in pleural effusion.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Comparing Deep Learning Models for Multi-cell Classification in Liquid- based Cervical Cytology Image.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019Article
- An evaluation of the construction of the device along with the software for digital archiving, sending the data, and supporting the diagnosis of cervical cancer.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2019Article
- Two-way detection of image features and immunolabeling of lymphoma cells with one-step microarray analysis.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer is the second leading cause of female-specific cancer-related deaths after breast cancer, especially in developing countries. However, the incidence of the disease may be significantly decreased if the patient is diagnosed in the pre-cancerous lesion stage or earlier. In recent years, computer-based algorithms are widely used in cervical cancer screening. Most of the proposed algorithms follow the procedure of segmentation, feature extraction, and then classification. Nevertheless, few of the existing segmentation methods are as flexible and robust as the human visual system, and the complexity of the algorithms makes it difficult for clinical application.
methodsIn this study, a computer-assisted analytical approach is proposed to identify the existence of suspicious cells in a whole slide cervical cell image (WSCCI). The main difference between our method and the conventional algorithm is that the image is divided into blocks with certain size instead of segmented cells, which can greatly reduce the computational complexity. Via data analysis, some texture and color histogram features show significant differences between blocks with and without suspicious cells. Therefore these features can be used as the input of the support vector machine classifier. 1100 non-background blocks (110 suspicious blocks) are trained to build a model, while 1040 blocks (491 non-background blocks) from 12 other WSCCIs are tested to verify the feasibility of the algorithm.
resultsThe experimental results show that the accuracy of our method is about 98.98 %. More importantly, the sensitivity, which is more fatal in cancer screening, is 95.0 % according to the images tested in the study, while the specificity is 99.33 %.
conclusionThe analysis of the algorithm is based on block images, which is different from conventional methods. Although some analysis work should be done in advance, the later processing speed will be greatly enhanced with the establishment of the model. Furthermore, since the algorithm is based on the actual WSCCI, the method will be of directive significance for clinical screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.