Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26847685›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2016

Automatic screening of cervical cells using block image processing.

Meng Zhao, Aiguo Wu, Jingjing Song, Xuguo Sun, Na Dong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Dual supervised sampling networks for real-time segmentation of cervical cell nucleus.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cervical cell recognition based on AGVF-Snake algorithm.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng ZhaoSchool of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. zh_m@tju.edu.cn.
Aiguo WuSchool of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. agwu@tju.edu.cn.
Jingjing SongSchool of Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. sife512@163.com.
Xuguo SunSchool of Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. sunxuguo@tijmu.edu.cn.
Na DongSchool of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. dongna@tju.edu.cn.
Tianjin University · CNTianjin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is the second leading cause of female-specific cancer-related deaths after breast cancer, especially in developing countries. However, the incidence of the disease may be significantly decreased if the patient is diagnosed in the pre-cancerous lesion stage or earlier. In recent years, computer-based algorithms are widely used in cervical cancer screening. Most of the proposed algorithms follow the procedure of segmentation, feature extraction, and then classification. Nevertheless, few of the existing segmentation methods are as flexible and robust as the human visual system, and the complexity of the algorithms makes it difficult for clinical application.

methodsIn this study, a computer-assisted analytical approach is proposed to identify the existence of suspicious cells in a whole slide cervical cell image (WSCCI). The main difference between our method and the conventional algorithm is that the image is divided into blocks with certain size instead of segmented cells, which can greatly reduce the computational complexity. Via data analysis, some texture and color histogram features show significant differences between blocks with and without suspicious cells. Therefore these features can be used as the input of the support vector machine classifier. 1100 non-background blocks (110 suspicious blocks) are trained to build a model, while 1040 blocks (491 non-background blocks) from 12 other WSCCIs are tested to verify the feasibility of the algorithm.

resultsThe experimental results show that the accuracy of our method is about 98.98 %. More importantly, the sensitivity, which is more fatal in cancer screening, is 95.0 % according to the images tested in the study, while the specificity is 99.33 %.

conclusionThe analysis of the algorithm is based on block images, which is different from conventional methods. Although some analysis work should be done in advance, the later processing speed will be greatly enhanced with the establishment of the model. Furthermore, since the algorithm is based on the actual WSCCI, the method will be of directive significance for clinical screening.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMolecular ImagingAutomationCervix UteriDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSupport Vector MachineUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26847685
PMCPMC4743397
OpenAlexW2269149831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.