Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26847639›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus species colonization in health care workers: the launch of invasive infections?

Supram Hosuru Subramanya, Sangita Thapa, Sanjiv Kumar Dwedi, Shishir Gokhale, Brijesh Sathian, Niranjan Nayak, Indira Bairy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Streptococcus pneumoniae colonization in health care professionals at a tertiary university pediatric hospital.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Oropharyngeal Carriage ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. A comparative profile of oropharyngeal colonization ofJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  12. Nasal and Pharyngeal Colonization by Bacterial Pathogens: A Comparative Study between Preclinical and Clinical Sciences Medical Students.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Supram Hosuru SubramanyaDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. supram.gowda@gmail.com.
Sangita ThapaDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. searose_123@yahoo.com.au.
Sanjiv Kumar DwediDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. sanju27384@yahoo.co.in.
Shishir GokhaleDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. shishimanju@gmail.com.
Brijesh SathianDepartment of Community Medicine, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. drsathian@gmail.com.
Niranjan NayakDepartment of Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. niruni2000@yahoo.com.
Indira BairyDepartment of Microbiology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, India. indira.bairy@manipal.edu.
Manipal College of Medical Sciences · NPManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStreptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae are important human pathogens. The risk of airborne and droplet-transmitted respiratory tract infections in healthcare workers (HCW) is substantial. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of oropharyngeal colonization with S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus spp. their antibiogram and risk factors of colonization in HCW at a tertiary care center, Western Nepal.

methodsDuring 3 month period, 100 oropharyngeal swab specimens were collected from HCW of Manipal Teaching Hospital and 50 from non HCW from community. All the 150 specimens were screened for Haemophilus spp. and S. pneumoniae by standard techniques. Serotyping of H. influenzae type b was done by using specific antiserum. Antibiotic sensitivity patterns of isolates were determined by modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. Association between the groups was analyzed using the Pearson χ(2) test and Fisher exact test. A forward step logistic regression model was used to identify significant predictors for colonization.

resultSixty-five percent of HCW were colonized with S. pneumoniae and/or Haemophilus species compared to 32 % of non-HCW. Health care workers had odd ratio (OR) 3.946 [CI (1.916, 8.128)] times more tendency of colonization compared to non-HCW (P < 0.05). Pneumococcal colonization was observed high among smokers (81.5 %). Amongst HCW, post graduate resident doctors had higher rate of colonization (83.3 %) followed by interns (64.9 %), least being amongst the laboratory workers (58.3 %).

conclusionThe higher rate of colonization amongst HCW raises the possibility of occupational risk as well as horizontal spread of infections.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelColony Count, MicrobialHaemophilus InfectionsHaemophilus influenzaeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMouthPharynxSmokingStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID26847639
PMCPMC4743163
OpenAlexW2267375496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.