Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26847625›Full record

Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2016

Maternal and foetal outcomes among 4118 women with HIV infection treated with lopinavir/ritonavir during pregnancy: analysis of population-based surveillance data from the national study of HIV in pregnancy and childhood in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Pat A Tookey, Claire Thorne, Jean van Wyk, Michael Norton

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Clinical Features and Maternal-fetal Results of Pregnant Women in COVID-19 Times.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. How should we treat pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2?BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020
    Review
  13. [COVID-19 infection in pregnancy: about a case].The Pan African medical journal · 2020
    Article
  14. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Newborn.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020
    Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Pat A TookeyUCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. p.tookey@ucl.ac.uk.
Claire ThorneUCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. claire.thorne@ucl.ac.uk.
Jean van WykAbbVie Inc, 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA. jean.vanwyk@abbvie.com.
Michael NortonAbbVie Inc, 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA. Michael.norton@abbvie.com.
AbbVie (United States) · USInstitute of Child Health · GR

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400546Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood (NSHPC) conducts comprehensive population-based surveillance of pregnancies in women with HIV infection in the United Kingdom/Ireland. Use of antepartum antiretroviral therapy (ART) for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) and to treat maternal infection, if required, is standard practise in this population; lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is commonly used. The study objective was to examine the use of LPV/r among pregnant women with HIV infection to describe maternal and foetal outcomes.

methodsThe NSHPC study collected maternal, perinatal and paediatric data through confidential and voluntary obstetric and paediatric reporting schemes. Pregnancies reported to the NSHPC by June 2013, due to deliver 2003-2012 and with LPV/r exposure were included in this analysis, using pregnancy as the unit of observation.

resultsFour thousand eight hundred sixty-four LPV/r-exposed pregnancies resulting in 4702 deliveries in 4118 women were identified. Maternal region of birth was primarily sub-Saharan Africa (77 %) or United Kingdom/Ireland (14 %). Median maternal age at conception was 30 years. LPV/r was initiated preconception in 980 (20 %) and postconception in 3884 (80 %) pregnancies; median duration of antepartum LPV/r exposure was 270 and 107 days, respectively. Viral load close to delivery was <50 copies/mL in 73 % and <1000 copies/mL in 94 % of women. 63 % of deliveries were by caesarean section (elective, 6 %; emergency, 38 %). Among singleton live births, 13 % were <37 weeks of gestation (2.5 % <32 weeks) and 15 % had birth weight <2500 g (2.3 % <1500 g). MTCT rates were 1.1 (2003-2007) and 0.5 % (2008-2012). 134 live born children (2.9 %) had ≥1 congenital abnormality.

conclusionsThe results of this analysis using real-world data from a large number of pregnant women with HIV infection in the United Kingdom and Ireland who received LPV/r-containing ART regimens demonstrate that these regimens have a good safety profile and are effective for viral suppression during pregnancy, with associated low rates of MTCT.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalIrelandLopinavirPopulation SurveillancePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnancy OutcomeRitonavirUnited KingdomAnti-HIV AgentsLopinavirRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID26847625
PMCPMC4743413
OpenAlexW2297207838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.