Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26847517›Full record

ReviewEuropean clinical respiratory journal2016

Participation in research bronchoscopy: a literature review.

Einar Marius Hjellestad Martinsen, Elise Orvedal Leiten, Per Sigvald Bakke, Tomas Mikal Lind Eagan, Rune Grønseth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European clinical respiratory journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Motivation and response rates in bronchoscopy studies.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbiota in Exhaled Breath Condensate and the Lung.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Einar Marius Hjellestad MartinsenDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; einar.martinsen@student.uib.no.
Elise Orvedal LeitenDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Per Sigvald BakkeDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Tomas Mikal Lind EaganDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Rune GrønsethDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchoscopy is the preferred method for collecting biological samples from the lower airways of subjects in clinical research. However, ensuring participation in clinical research can be challenging when the research includes an invasive procedure. For this report we reviewed the literature to look for information on participation in research bronchoscopy studies to better design our own study, the Bergen COPD Microbiome study (MicroCOPD). We performed a systematic literature search on participation in research bronchoscopy studies in February 2014 using the search engines of PubMed and EMBASE. The literature search resulted in seven relevant papers. Motivation was an end point in six of the seven papers, but reasons for declining participation and recruitment strategies also seemed important. Human subjects participate in research bronchoscopy studies for personal benefit and altruistic reasons. Inconvenience associated with research, in addition to fear of procedures, is considered a barrier. Radio, especially news stations, generated the most inquiries for a clinical study involving bronchoscopy. There is a lack of information on participation in research bronchoscopy studies in the literature. A bronchoscopy study has been initiated at Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, to examine the role of the microbiome in COPD, and participation will be explored as a substudy.

Indexed as

clinical researchCOPDhuman volunteersmotivationrefusal to participateresearch subjects

Identifiers

PMID26847517
PMCPMC4742466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.