Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26847452›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2016

Ceramic Heads Decrease Metal Release Caused by Head-taper Fretting and Corrosion.

Sevi B Kocagoz, Richard J Underwood, Daniel W MacDonald, Jeremy L Gilbert, Steven M Kurtz

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Oxidised zirconium heads show a lower linear wear rate than 28-mm metal heads against XLPE: a retrospective analysis.Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A comparison of metal/metal and ceramic/metal taper-trunnion modular connections in explanted total hip replacements.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. What Factors Drive Taper Corrosion?The Journal of arthroplasty · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sevi B KocagozSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. sk997@drexel.edu.
Richard J UnderwoodSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Daniel W MacDonaldSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jeremy L GilbertSyracuse Biomaterials Institute and Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Steven M KurtzSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

MECHANISMS &PERFORMANCE OF TRACEABLE UHMWPE IMPLANTSR01AR047904 · NIAMS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI KURTZ, STEVEN MICHAEL · 2001 to 2015
$6.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR047904NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR47904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetal release resulting from taper fretting and corrosion is a clinical concern, because wear and corrosion products may stimulate adverse local tissue reactions. Unimodular hip arthroplasties have a conical taper between the femoral head (head bore taper) and the femoral stem (stem cone taper). The use of ceramic heads has been suggested as a way of reducing the generation of wear and corrosion products from the head bore/stem cone taper junction. A previous semiquantitative study found that ceramic heads had less visual evidence of fretting-corrosion damage compared with CoCr heads; but, to our knowledge, no studies have quantified the volumetric material loss from the head bore and stem cone tapers of a matched cohort of ceramic and metal heads. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Do ceramic heads result in less volume of material loss at the head-stem junction compared with CoCr heads; (2) do stem cone tapers have less volumetric material loss compared with CoCr head bore tapers; (3) do visual fretting-corrosion scores correlate with volumetric material loss; and (4) are device, patient, or intraoperative factors associated with volumetric material loss?

methodsA quantitative method was developed to estimate volumetric material loss from the head and stem taper in previously matched cohorts of 50 ceramic and 50 CoCr head-stem pairs retrieved during revision surgery for causes not related to adverse reactions to metal particles. The cohorts were matched according to (1) implantation time, (2) stem flexural rigidity, and (3) lateral offset. Fretting corrosion was assessed visually using a previously published four-point, semiquantitative scoring system. The volumetric loss was measured using a precision roundness machine. Using 24 equally spaced axial traces, the volumetric loss was estimated using a linear least squares fit to interpolate the as-manufactured surfaces. The results of this analysis were considered in the context of device (taper angle clearance, head size, head offset, lateral offset, stem material, and stem surface finish) and patient factors that were obtained from the patients' operative records (implantation time, age at insertion, activity level, and BMI).

resultsThe cumulative volumetric material losses estimated for the ceramic cohort had a median of 0.0 mm(3) per year (range, 0.0-0.4 mm(3)). The cumulative volumetric material losses estimated for the CoCr cohort had a median of 0.1 mm(3) per year (range, 0.0-8.8 mm(3)). An order of magnitude reduction in volumetric material loss was found when a ceramic head was used instead of a CoCr head (p < 0.0001). In the CoCr cohort, the femoral head bore tapers had a median material loss of 0.02 mm(3) (range, 0.0-8.7 mm(3)) and the stem cone tapers had a median material loss of 0.0 mm(3) (range, 0.0-0.32 mm(3)/year). There was greater material loss from femoral head bore tapers compared with stem cone tapers in the CoCr cohort (p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between visual scoring and volumetric material loss (Spearman's ρ = 0.67, p < 0.01). Although visual scoring was effective for preliminary screening to separate tapers with no or mild damage from tapers with moderate to severe damage, it was not capable of discriminating in the large range of material loss observed at the taper surfaces with moderate to severe fretting-corrosion damage, indicated with a score of 3 or 4. We observed no correlations between volumetric material loss and device and patient factors.

conclusionsThe majority of estimated material loss from the head bore-stem cone junctions resulting from taper fretting and corrosion was from the CoCr head bore tapers as opposed to the stem cone tapers. Additionally, the total material loss from the ceramic cohort showed a reduction in the amount of metal released by an order of magnitude compared with the CoCr cohort. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We found that ceramic femoral heads may be an effective means by which to reduce metal release caused by taper fretting and corrosion at the head bore-stem cone modular interface in THAs.

Indexed as

CeramicsChromium AlloysHip ProsthesisAdultAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCorrosionFemaleFemur HeadHip JointHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignChromium Alloys

Identifiers

PMID26847452
PMCPMC4773353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.