Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26847421›Full record

Trial reportPatient education and counseling2016

Between-race differences in the effects of breast density information and information about new imaging technology on breast-health decision-making.

Mark Manning, Kristen Purrington, Louis Penner, Neb Duric, Terrance L Albrecht

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark ManningKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States. Electronic address: manningm@karmanos.org.
Kristen PurringtonKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States.
Louis PennerKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States.
Neb DuricKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States.
Terrance L AlbrechtKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States.

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSome US states have mandated that women be informed when they have dense breasts; however, little is known about how general knowledge about breast density (BD) affects related health decision-making. We examined the effects of BD information and imaging technology information on 138 African-American (AA) and European-American (EA) women's intentions to discuss breast cancer screening with their physicians.

methodsWomen were randomly assigned to receive BD information and/or imaging technology information via 2 by 2 factorial design, and completed planned behavior measures (e.g., attitudes, intentions) related to BC screening.

resultsAttitudes mediated the effects of BD information, and the mediation was stronger for AA women compared to EA women. Effects were more robust for BD information compared to imaging technology information. Results of moderator analyses revealed suppressor effects of injunctive norms that were moderated by imaging technology information.

conclusionInformation about BD favorably influences women's intentions to engage in relevant breast health behaviors. Stronger attitude mediated-effects for AA women suggest greater scrutiny of BD information. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Since BD information may influence women's intentions to discuss BC screening, strategies to effectively present BD information to AA women should be investigated given the likelihood of their increased scrutiny of BD information.

Indexed as

Breast DensityDecision MakingAdultAttitude to HealthBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsDensitometryFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIntentionProcess Assessment, Health CareWhite PeopleBreast cancer screening intentionsBreast densityBreast density knowledgeTheory of planned behavior

Identifiers

PMID26847421
PMCPMC4988060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.