Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26847352›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2016

Comparison of Risk Factors for Unplanned Conversion from Laparoscopic and Robotic to Open Colorectal Surgery Using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) Database.

Anuradha R Bhama, Abdullah M Wafa, Jane Ferraro, Stacey D Collins, Andrew J Mullard, James F Vandewarker, Greta Krapohl, John C Byrn, Robert K Cleary

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Simultaneous Robot Assisted Colon and Liver Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Surgical Approaches to Proctectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Laparoscopic Versus Open Emergent Sigmoid Resection for Perforated Diverticulitis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anuradha R BhamaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Health System-Ann Arbor, 5325 Elliott Dr, MHVI Suite #104, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA. anuradha.bhama@gmail.com.
Abdullah M WafaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Health System-Ann Arbor, 5325 Elliott Dr, MHVI Suite #104, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA.
Jane FerraroDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Health System-Ann Arbor, 5325 Elliott Dr, MHVI Suite #104, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA.
Stacey D CollinsMichigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.
Andrew J MullardMichigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.
James F VandewarkerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Health System-Ann Arbor, 5325 Elliott Dr, MHVI Suite #104, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA.
Greta KrapohlMichigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.
John C ByrnMichigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.
Robert K ClearyDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Health System-Ann Arbor, 5325 Elliott Dr, MHVI Suite #104, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic colorectal surgery has been shown to have lower rates of unplanned conversion to open surgery when compared to laparoscopic surgery. Risk factors associated with conversion from robotic to open colectomy and comparisons of the risk factors between robotic and laparoscopic approaches have not been previously reported. Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries between July 1, 2012 and April 28, 2015, were identified in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry. Candidate covariates were identified, and hierarchical logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for conversion. There were 4796 cases that met study inclusion criteria. Conversion was required in 18.2 % of laparoscopic and 7.7 % of robotic cases (p < 0.0001). Risk factors for conversion in the laparoscopic group included the following: moderate/severe adhesions, obesity, colorectal cancer, hypertension, rectal operations, urgent priority, and tobacco use. Risk factors for conversion in the robotic group included the following: severe adhesions, bleeding disorder, presence of cancer, cirrhosis, and use of statins. Higher surgeon volume was protective in both groups. Conversion rates are lower for robotic than for laparoscopic colorectal surgery with fewer predictors of conversion. Recognition of factors predicting conversion may allow surgeons to choose an operative approach that optimizes the benefits of the available technologies.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedColectomyConversion to Open SurgeryDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMichiganMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRectumRetrospective StudiesColorectal surgeryConversion to open surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryRobotic surgical procedures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.