Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26847076›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2016

Battery drain in daily practice and medium-term projections on longevity of cardioverter-defibrillators: an analysis from a remote monitoring database.

Giuseppe Boriani, Philippe Ritter, Mauro Biffi, Matteo Ziacchi, Igor Diemberger, Cristian Martignani, Cinzia Valzania, Sergio Valsecchi, Luigi Padeletti, Fredrik Gadler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transvenous or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a review to aid decision-making.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Single- and multi-site pacing strategies for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy: impact on device longevity and therapy cost.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021
    Article
  6. Plasticity of left ventricular function with cardiac resynchronization therapy.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2020
    Article
  7. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators - the past, present and future.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The economic impact of battery longevity in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the hospital and healthcare system perspectives.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giuseppe BorianiInstitute of Cardiology, University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy Department of Cardiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy giuseppe.boriani@unimore.it.
Philippe RitterHôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, France.
Mauro BiffiInstitute of Cardiology, University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Matteo ZiacchiInstitute of Cardiology, University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Igor DiembergerInstitute of Cardiology, University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Cristian MartignaniInstitute of Cardiology, University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Cinzia ValzaniaInstitute of Cardiology, University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Sergio ValsecchiBoston Scientific Italia, Milan, Italy.
Luigi PadelettiUniversity of Florence, Florence, Italy IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy.
Fredrik GadlerKarolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe longevity of generators is a crucial determinant of the cost-effectiveness of therapy with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D). We evaluated the trend of device-measured residual battery capacity and longevity projections over 5-year follow-up. We also investigated possible factors associated with battery drain. METHODS AND

resultsData from 4851 patients in the European LATITUDE(®) database who were followed up for a minimum of 3 years were analysed. The factors associated with battery drain (i.e. year-to-year decrease in residual battery capacity), and thus potentially impacting on device longevity, were mainly the pacing parameters in CRT-D devices and the number of shocks delivered and diverted in both ICD and CRT-D (all P < 0.01 on linear regression analysis). Over the first 5 years, the longevity estimates provided by devices showed low intra-patient variability and increased with time. The estimates exceeded 10 years for CRT-D and 13 and 12 years for single- and dual-chamber ICDs, respectively. In CRT-D patients, the expected patient age on replacement was 80 ± 12 years, and the expected probability of undergoing device replacement was 63 ± 13% for New York Heart Association (NYHA) II patients and 37 ± 16% for NYHA III patients. For comparison, the probabilities of replacing a CRT-D lasting 5 years were 78 ± 8 and 59 ± 13%, respectively (both P < 0.001).

conclusionBattery drain was mainly associated with pacing output in CRT-D devices and with the number of capacitor charges in both ICD and CRT-D devices. The longevity estimates provided by the devices were consistent and conservative. According to these estimates, among CRT-D recipients a low proportion of patients should require device replacement.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesDefibrillators, ImplantableElectric Power SuppliesProsthesis FailureRemote Sensing TechnologyChi-Square DistributionDatabases, FactualDevice RemovalElectric CountershockHumansLinear ModelsProsthesis DesignRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBatteryCardiac resynchronization therapyImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorLongevityRemote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID26847076
PMCPMC5006961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.