ReviewRadiation oncology (London, England)2016
Involved-field radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: theory and practice.
Review in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of radiation dose on the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer biology & therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of modern high-dose versus standard-dose radiation in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on outcome of esophageal squamous cell cancer: a meta-analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of elective nodal irradiation and involved-field irradiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Journal of radiation research · 2018Pooled it
- Advances in the treatment of unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Association between serum levels of 12 different cytokines and short-term efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Irradiation Induces Gasdermin E-Triggered Tumor Immunity to Inhibit Esophageal Carcinoma Cell Survival.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Intensity modulated radiation therapy for elderly patients with esophageal cancer: Our experience.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2023Article
- Long-term results of chemoradiotherapy with elective nodal irradiation for resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer in three-dimensional planning system.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Application and development of nanomaterials in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Article
- Principle and progress of radical treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
- Article
- A combined predicting model for benign esophageal stenosis after simultaneous integrated boost in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (GASTO1072).Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- A review of radiation-induced lymphopenia in patients with esophageal cancer: an immunological perspective for radiotherapy.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Review
- Low Lymphocyte Count Is Associated With Radiotherapy Parameters and Affects the Outcomes of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Prediction of response after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer using a combination of dosimetry and CT radiomics.European radiology · 2019Article
- Involved-field chemoradiotherapy for postoperative solitary lymph node recurrence of esophageal cancer.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2018Article
- Elective nodal irradiation or involved-field irradiation in definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell cancer: a retrospective analysis in clinical N0 patients.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2018Article
- Radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: dose, response and survival.Cancer management and research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal carcinoma (EC) is characterized by a high rate of lymph node metastasis and its spread pattern is not always predictable. Chemoradiotherapy has an important role in the treatment of EC in both the inoperable and the pre-operative settings. However, regarding the target volume for radiation, different clinical practices exist. Theoretically, in addition to the clinical target volume administered to the gross lesion, it might seem logical to deliver a certain dose to the uninvolved regional lymph node area at risk for microscopic disease. However, in practice, it is difficult because of the intolerance of normal tissue to radiotherapy (RT), particularly if all regions containing the cervical, mediastinal, and upper abdominal nodes are covered. To date, the use of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) is still controversial in the field of radiotherapy. Some investigators use involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) in order to reduce treatment-related toxicities. It is thought that micrometastases can be controlled, to some extent, by chemotherapy and the abscopal effects of radiation. It is the presence of overtly involved lymph nodes rather than the micrometastatic nodes negatively affects survival in patients with EC. In another hand, lymph nodes stationed near primary tumors also receive considerable incidental irradiation doses that may contribute to the elimination of subclinical lesions. These data indicate that an irradiation volume covering only the gross tumor is appropriate. When using ENI or IFRT, very few patients experience solitary regional node failure and out-of-field lymph node failure is not common. Primary tumor recurrence and distant metastases, rather than regional lymph node failure, affect the overall survival in patients with EC. The available evidence indicates that the use of ENI seems to prevent or delay regional nodal relapse rather than improve survival. In a word, these data suggest that IFRT is feasible in EC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.