Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26846841›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

GenAp: a distributed SQL interface for genomic data.

Christos Kozanitis, David A Patterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. htsget: a protocol for securely streaming genomic data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christos KozanitisDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Berkeley, Soda Hall, Berkeley, 94720, California, USA. kozanitis@eecs.berkeley.edu.
David A PattersonDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Berkeley, Soda Hall, Berkeley, 94720, California, USA. pattersn@eecs.berkeley.edu.

Funding

Training SubprojectU54HG007990 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI HAUSSLER, DAVID H, PATTERSON, DAVID · 2014 to 2018
$14.8M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400006CNHGRI NIH HHS 1-U54HG007990-01NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG007990PHS HHS HHSN261201400006C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impressively low cost and improved quality of genome sequencing provides to researchers of genetic diseases, such as cancer, a powerful tool to better understand the underlying genetic mechanisms of those diseases and treat them with effective targeted therapies. Thus, a number of projects today sequence the DNA of large patient populations each of which produces at least hundreds of terra-bytes of data. Now the challenge is to provide the produced data on demand to interested parties.

resultsIn this paper, we show that the response to this challenge is a modified version of Spark SQL, a distributed SQL execution engine, that handles efficiently joins that use genomic intervals as keys. With this modification, Spark SQL serves such joins more than 50× faster than its existing brute force approach and 8× faster than similar distributed implementations. Thus, Spark SQL can replace existing practices to retrieve genomic data and, as we show, allow users to reduce the number of lines of software code that needs to be developed to query such data by an order of magnitude.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsChromosome MappingComputational BiologyDatabases, Nucleic AcidGenome, HumanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNAUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID26846841
PMCPMC4741060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.