Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26846789›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2016

A review of methods and tools to assess the implementation of government policies to create healthy food environments for preventing obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases.

Sirinya Phulkerd, Mark Lawrence, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Gary Sacks, Anthony Worsley, Viroj Tangcharoensathien

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Measurement Methods Used to Assess the School Food Environment: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Integrative development of a short screening questionnaire of highly processed food consumption (sQ-HPF).The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. European Rural Development Policy Approaching Health Issues: An Exploration of Programming Schemes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sirinya PhulkerdSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia. sphulker@deakin.edu.au.
Mark LawrenceCentre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia. mark.lawrence@deakin.edu.au.
Stefanie VandevijvereDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. s.vandevijvere@auckland.ac.nz.
Gary SacksWHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia. gary.sacks@deakin.edu.au.
Anthony WorsleyCentre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia. anthony.worsley@deakin.edu.au.
Viroj TangcharoensathienInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolicies to create healthy food environments are recognized as critical components of efforts to prevent obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases. There has not been a systematic review of existing methods and tools used to assess the implementation of these government policies. The purpose of this study was to review methods and tools used for assessing the implementation of government policies to create healthy food environments. The study conducted a systematic literature search. Multiple databases as well as the grey literature were searched. All study designs and review papers on assessing the implementation of government policies to create healthy food environments were included. A quality assessment of the methods and tools identified from relevant studies was carried out using the following four criteria: comprehensiveness, relevance, generalizability and feasibility. This quality assessment was completed by two independent reviewers.

resultsThe review identified 52 studies across different policy areas, levels and settings. Self-administered questionnaires and policy checklists were most commonly applied to assess the extent of policy implementation, whereas semi-structured interviews were most commonly used to evaluate the implementation process. Measures varied widely, with the existence of policy implementation the aspect most commonly assessed. The most frequently identified barriers and facilitators for policy implementation were infrastructure support, resources and stakeholder engagement. The assessment of policy implementation on food environments was usually undertaken in combination with other policy areas, particularly nutrition education and physical activity. Three tools/methods were rated 'high' quality and 13 tools/methods received 'medium' quality ratings.

conclusionsHarmonization of the available high-quality methods and tools is needed to ensure that assessment of government policy implementation can be compared across different countries and settings and over time. This will contribute to efforts to increase government accountability for their actions to improve the healthiness of food environments.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth EducationHealth PolicyHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID26846789
PMCPMC4743239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.