Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26846749›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2016

Online Patient Education for Chronic Disease Management: Consumer Perspectives.

Khin Than Win, Naffisah Mohd Hassan, Harri Oinas-Kukkonen, Yasmine Probst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Web-Based Patient Education in Orthopedics: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Randomized controlled trial of an app for cancer pain management.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Readability, Reliability, and Quality Analysis of Internet-Based Patient Education Materials and Large Language Models on Meniere's Disease.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Khin Than WinFaculty of Engineering and Information Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. win@uow.edu.au.
Naffisah Mohd HassanFaculty of Engineering and Information Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. nmh786@uowmail.edu.au.
Harri Oinas-KukkonenDepartment of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. harri.oinas-kukkonen@oulu.fi.
Yasmine ProbstFaculty of Engineering and Information Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. yasmine@uow.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient education plays an important role in chronic disease management. The aim of this study is to identify patients' preferences in regard to the design features of effective online patient education (OPE) and the benefits. A review of the existing literature was conducted in order to identify the benefits of OPE and its essential design features. These design features were empirically tested by conducting survey with patients and caregivers. Reliability analysis, construct validity and regression analysis were performed for data analysis. The results identified patient-tailored information, interactivity, content credibility, clear presentation of content, use of multimedia and interpretability as the essential design features of online patient education websites for chronic disease management.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementInternetPatient PreferenceAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicReproducibility of ResultsDesign featuresOnline patient educationPatient educationPersuasive systems designTailored information

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.