Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26846719›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicity research2016

Methamphetamine-, d-Amphetamine-, and p-Chloroamphetamine-Induced Neurotoxicity Differentially Effect Impulsive Responding on the Stop-Signal Task in Rats.

Teri M Furlong, Lee S Leavitt, Kristen A Keefe, Jong-Hyun Son

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Teri M FurlongDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, 30 S. 2000 E., Rm 201, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. teri.furlong@utah.edu.
Lee S LeavittDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, 30 S. 2000 E., Rm 201, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Kristen A KeefeDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, 30 S. 2000 E., Rm 201, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Jong-Hyun SonDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, 30 S. 2000 E., Rm 201, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Long-term consequences of methamphetamine toxicityR01DA024036 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KEEFE, KRISTEN A · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS DA024036NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abused amphetamines, such as d-amphetamine (AMPH) and methamphetamine (METH), are highly addictive and destructive to health and productive lifestyles. The abuse of these drugs is associated with impulsive behavior, which is likely to contribute to addiction. The amphetamines also differentially damage dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) systems, which regulate impulsive behavior; therefore, exposure to these drugs may differentially alter impulsive behavior to effect the progression of addiction. We examined the impact of neurotoxicity induced by three amphetamines on impulsive action using a stop-signal task in rats. Animals were rewarded with a food pellet after lever pressing (i.e., a go trial), unless an auditory cue was presented and withholding lever press gained reward (i.e., a stop trial). Animals were trained on the task and then exposed to a neurotoxic regimen of either AMPH, p-chloroamphetamine (PCA), or METH. These regimens preferentially reduced DA transporter levels in striatum, 5-HT transporter levels in prefrontal cortex, or both, respectively. Assessment of performance on the stop-signal task beginning 1 week after the treatment revealed that AMPH produced a deficit in go-trial performance, whereas PCA did not alter performance on either trial type. In contrast, METH produced a deficit in stop-trial performance (i.e., impulsive action) but not go-trial performance. These findings suggest that the different neurotoxic consequences of substituted amphetamines are associated with different effects on inhibitory control over behavior. Thus, the course of addiction and maladaptive behavior resulting from exposure to these substances is likely to differ.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody TemperatureBrainCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetamineDisease Models, AnimalDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsImpulsive BehaviorMaleMethamphetamineMotor ActivityNeuropsychological TestsNeurotoxicity Syndromesp-ChloroamphetamineRatsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetamineDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsMethamphetaminep-ChloroamphetamineSerotoninSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsAmphetamineBehavioral inhibitionDopamineImpulsive actionSerotoninStop-signal task

Identifiers

PMID26846719
PMCPMC4821695
OpenAlexW2303457420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.