Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26846668›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2016

Remote cerebellar hemorrhage after supratentorial procedures (part 1): a systematic review.

Carmelo Lucio Sturiale, Marta Rossetto, Mario Ermani, Francesco Volpin, Valentina Baro, Laura Milanese, Luca Denaro, Domenico d'Avella

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A review of MRI signal changes of cerebellar disorders in adults.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Remote cerebellar hemorrhage after a neurosurgical procedure: A report of three cases.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Remote cerebellar hemorrhage: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Remote cerebellar haemorrhage: A case report.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carmelo Lucio SturialeDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua (IT), Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. cropcircle.2000@virgilio.it.
Marta RossettoDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua (IT), Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Mario ErmaniDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua (IT), Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Francesco VolpinDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua (IT), Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Valentina BaroDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua (IT), Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Laura MilaneseDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua (IT), Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Luca DenaroDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua (IT), Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Domenico d'AvellaDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua (IT), Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A remote cerebellar hemorrhage (RCH) is a spontaneous bleeding in the posterior fossa, which may rarely occurs as a complication of supratentorial procedures, and it shows a typical bleeding pattern defined "the zebra sign." However, its pathophysiology still remains unknown. We performed a comprehensive review collecting all cases of RCH after supratentorial craniotomies reported in literature in order to identify the most frequently associated procedures and the possible risk factors. We assessed percentages of incidence and 95 % confidence intervals of all demographic, neuroradiological, and clinical features of the patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate their association with outcome. We included 49 articles reporting 209 patients with a mean age of 49.09 ± 17.07 years and a male/female ratio 130/77. A RCH was more frequently reported as a complication of supratentorial craniotomies for intracranial aneurysms, tumors debulking, and lobectomies. In the majority of cases, RCH occurrence was associated with impairment of consciousness, although some patients remained asymptomatic or showed only slight cerebellar signs. Coagulation disorders, perioperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage, hypertension, and seizures were the most frequently reported risk factors. Zebra sign was the most common bleeding pattern, being observed in about 65 % out of the cases, followed by parenchymal hematoma and mixed hemorrhage in similar percentages. A multivariate analysis showed that symptomatic onset and intake of antiplatelets/anticoagulants within a week from surgery were independent predictors of poor outcome. However, about 75 % out of patients showed a good outcome and a RCH often appeared as a benign and self-limiting condition, which usually did not require surgical treatment, but only prolonged clinical surveillance, unless in the event of the occurrence of complications.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageCerebrospinal Fluid LeakHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative HemorrhageTreatment OutcomeCerebellar strokeRemote cerebellar hemorrhageSupratentorial craniotomyZebra sign

Identifiers

PMID26846668
OpenAlexW2289204253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.